GDP by Industry [USA is in a deep recession]

Hi,
ChatGPT tells me:
2022: Technical Recession (But Not Official)
- The U.S. experienced two consecutive quarters
of negative GDP growth in early 2022 (Q1: -1.6%,
Q2: -0.6%), which is often considered a
technical recession.
2023:  Big Tech has outperformed other sectors, meaning
GDP growth excluding these firms would likely be weaker.
For example, in 2023, tech stocks surged, but industries
like manufacturing, retail, and housing struggled.
So basically using Zoom during Corona saved
the Big Techs, but the country went down otherwise?
Bye
P.S.: Ha Ha, very funny:
Selected data tables have been discontinued due to budget constraints.
https://www.bea.gov/itable/gdp-by-industry
So USA is fucked, and it doesn't want to let the people know?
Or asked otherwise, where can I get the fucking data, from DOGE?
Schrieb:

On 3/27/25 02:24, Mild Shock wrote:

Hi,
>
USA finally getting out of recession:
>
Trump Announces Creation Of Strategic JD Vance Meme Reserve
https://babylonbee.com/news/trump-announces-creation-of-strategic-jd-vance-meme-reserve >
>
Bye
>
Mild Shock schrieb:

 Interesting.  I did not know that the US was in a recession.
 I am thinking that recession has to do with decline from
previous earlier GDPs, and I am not sure if inflation
is calculated into that.
 I am thinking that one unusual thing about recent times
is that usually something like this happens.
 1. People in theory 'outside of government' do something
that someone could call 'irresponsible' (like speculative
trading on a stock market causes some people to lose money
and some people to make money like usual).
 2. Then 'the government' 'rescues' the 'economy' from
'the irresponsible people' ('outside of the government').
 However this recent one is different.
 Effectively the ('GOVERNMENT') CAUSED the recession.  (By
ordering whole sections of the economy to shut down.)
 Because 'THE GOVERNMENT' CAUSED the recession it became
harder to call people ('OUTSIDE THE GOVERNMENT') the
REASON for the economic decline.
 Basically, reporters sent cameras into hospitals and
started reporting PEOPLE ARE DYING IN HOSPITALS!!!
(like they were not doing that before then).  Because
of that it became difficult to evaluate what would have
been a proportionate response.
  

Hi,
>
So it wasn't James Bond 007 who recruited Mussolini.
>
I am little disappointed now...
>
LoL
>
Bye
>
Thomas Heger schrieb:
 > Am Mittwoch000026, 26.03.2025 um 08:39 schrieb J. J. Lodder:
 >
 >>> It is historically incorrect, because Mussolini came earlier than Hitler
 >>> (roughly ten years).
 >>>
 >>> And Mussolini was on the payroll of the British MI6.
 >>
 >> There you go again.
 >> Do you really need to be crazy about every aspect of history?
 >>
 >
 > Here comes a quote from British mainstream media:
 >
 > https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/oct/13/benito-mussolini-recruited-mi5-italy >
 >
 > quote:
 >
 > "Archived documents have revealed that Mussolini got his start in politics in 1917 with the help of a £100 weekly wage from MI5."
 >
 > (So, actually I made a mistake and Mussolini didn't work for MI6 but for MI5.
 >
 > Sorry for that...)
 >
 > But also Stalin and Hitler were (allegedly) on the payroll of UK-intelligence:
 >
 > https://www.amazon.de/-/en/True-Crime-Solving-History-Vol/dp/047311478X
 >
 > https://www.amazon.de/Stalins-British-Training/dp/0473120739
 >
 >
 > TH
 >
>

>