Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum

On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 0:47:33 +0000, Peter Moylan wrote:

On 13/03/25 02:40, David Canzi wrote:
>

The relativism you hate didn't come from Einstein.  It was there all
along in Newton's physics.  Strange that you selectively hate
Einstein but not Newton.

Newton was correct with whatever he wrote while Einstein was the body
and soul of dishonest anti science.
Arindam updated Newton's laws and discarded Einstein's ridiculous
theories.
Arindam's main target is Helmholtz with his energy conservation laws and
from that the wrong laws of thermodynamics.

>
That's an important point. If you read Arindam's claims, which I once
did on a day when I was bored, he has disproved Newton's laws of motion.

No, Arindam updated Newton's laws of motion. He did not disprove them.

He doesn't say that himself, because he hasn't yet realised that a
failure of conservation of momentum would contradict what Newton said.

Of course it would so Arindam updated Newton's laws. When inertia is
violated with internal force the conservation laws of momentum and
rnergy fail.
With his new invention of the heavy armature low voltage em rail gun
Arindam violated inertia and the laws of conservation of momentum and of
energy. Thus totally revising the basics of physics.

>
So Einstein gets the blame for accepting Newton's results.

Einstein gets the blame for rampant and extraordinary dishonesty now
practised globally.
Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
Bertietaylor
--