Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum
De : bertietaylor (at) *nospam* myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor)
Groupes : sci.physics
Date : 31. Mar 2025, 00:04:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Rocksolid Light
Message-ID : <d7d5057eda64a5a3280ee30f2e421d54@www.novabbs.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 23:12:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 8:08:49 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>
Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> wrote:
>
On 13/03/25 03:21, jerryfriedman wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 21:55:47 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
>
When we say tire pressure is so much, that means there is so much
force acting normally on the tire wall per square inch.
>
That's true.  The magnitude of the force is given by the pressure and
the area, both scalars, and the direction of the force vector is
normal to the tire wall.
>
Something that I forgot to mention.
>
Although all of the above is true, it talks only about the force on the
wall. There is also pressure all the way through the interior of the
tyre.
>
In what direction is that pressure acting? If we accept that pressure is
a scalar, there is nothing more to explain. If it's a vector, then away
from the walls it is acting in all directions, which is at least a
little weird.
>
Actually it is a tensor,
which may reduce to a scalar under suitable circumstances,
>
Like trying to prove certain wrong theories. Immense gravitational
pressure existing (despite gravitational zero force) at the centre of
the Sun to create fusion for solar energy!
>
Since you have no education in nuclear physics
Arindam has in his possession a textbook on nuclear physics by Kaplan.
Heavy reliance on the e=mcc crap here to justify the nucleus protons.
Whereas they are simply held together by electrons. So fundamentally
wrong.
and zero experimental
information on the subject,
Wrong Arindam found in 2005 that the Michelson Morley interferometer
experiment showed that the results actually showed that light speed
varied with the emitter. That knocked out the basis for e=mcc.
He then violated inertia with his rail gun experiments. Thus proving his
physics correct.
what leads you to believe you know anything
about the subject, Arindam?
Arindam being the greatest genius of all time just does what he does,
following Divine inspiration. He cares nothing for silly questions.
Especially from smartypants atheists with science pretensions.
Woof-woof woof woof woof-woof woof
Bertietaylor
>
Of course I mean other than your insanity?
--

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Mar 25 * Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum116Bertietaylor
8 Mar 25 +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum87Ross Clark
8 Mar 25 i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum85Peter Moylan
8 Mar 25 ii`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum84Bertietaylor
8 Mar 25 ii `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum83Bertietaylor
8 Mar 25 ii  +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum74Phil
9 Mar 25 ii  i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum10bertietaylor
9 Mar 25 ii  ii`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum9Rich Ulrich
9 Mar 25 ii  ii +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Richard Heathfield
31 Mar 25 ii  ii i`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
9 Mar 25 ii  ii `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum6J. J. Lodder
9 Mar 25 ii  ii  +- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Physfitfreak
10 Mar 25 ii  ii  +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3jerryfriedman
10 Mar 25 ii  ii  i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2J. J. Lodder
10 Mar 25 ii  ii  i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1jerryfriedman
31 Mar 25 ii  ii  `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
9 Mar 25 ii  i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum63Peter Moylan
10 Mar 25 ii  i +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum42bertitaylor
10 Mar 25 ii  i i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum34jerryfriedman
10 Mar 25 ii  i ii+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum31Bertitaylor
12 Mar 25 ii  i iii`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum30jerryfriedman
13 Mar 25 ii  i iii +- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
13 Mar 25 ii  i iii +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Peter Moylan
13 Mar 25 ii  i iii i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Tony Cooper
13 Mar 25 ii  i iii ii`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
31 Mar 25 ii  i iii i`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
13 Mar 25 ii  i iii `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum24Peter Moylan
13 Mar 25 ii  i iii  `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum23J. J. Lodder
26 Mar 25 ii  i iii   `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum22Bertitaylor
27 Mar 25 ii  i iii    `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum21Jim Pennino
27 Mar 25 ii  i iii     +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum9Bertitaylor
27 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum8Jim Pennino
27 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum7bertitaylor
27 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i  `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum6Jim Pennino
27 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i   `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum5Bertitaylor
28 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i    `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Jim Pennino
28 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i     `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3Bertitaylor
28 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i      `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Jim Pennino
28 Mar 25 ii  i iii     i       `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
31 Mar 25 ii  i iii     `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum11Bertitaylor
31 Mar 25 ii  i iii      `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum10Jim Pennino
8 Apr 25 ii  i iii       `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum9Bertitaylor
8 Apr 25 ii  i iii        `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum8Jim Pennino
8 Apr 25 ii  i iii         +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Bertitaylor
8 Apr 25 ii  i iii         i`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Jim Pennino
8 Apr 25 ii  i iii         `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum5x
9 Apr 25 ii  i iii          `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Bertitaylor
9 Apr 25 ii  i iii           `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3Jim Pennino
9 Apr 25 ii  i iii            `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Bertitaylor
9 Apr 25 ii  i iii             `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Jim Pennino
10 Mar 25 ii  i ii`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Richard Heathfield
10 Mar 25 ii  i ii `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
12 Mar 25 ii  i i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum7David Canzi
12 Mar 25 ii  i i +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum5Snidely
12 Mar 25 ii  i i i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4J. J. Lodder
13 Mar 25 ii  i i i `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3Peter Moylan
13 Mar 25 ii  i i i  `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2J. J. Lodder
13 Mar 25 ii  i i i   `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Phil
13 Mar 25 ii  i i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
10 Mar 25 ii  i +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Rich Ulrich
10 Mar 25 ii  i i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2J. J. Lodder
31 Mar 25 ii  i ii`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
14 Mar 25 ii  i i`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
10 Mar 25 ii  i `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum16jerryfriedman
11 Mar 25 ii  i  +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum13Peter Moylan
11 Mar 25 ii  i  i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum10Snidely
11 Mar 25 ii  i  ii`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum9Peter Moylan
11 Mar 25 ii  i  ii +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3Richard Heathfield
11 Mar 25 ii  i  ii i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Physfitfreak
11 Mar 25 ii  i  ii i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
11 Mar 25 ii  i  ii +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Snidely
11 Mar 25 ii  i  ii i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3jerryfriedman
12 Mar 25 ii  i  ii i +- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Snidely
31 Mar 25 ii  i  ii i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
31 Mar 25 ii  i  ii `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
11 Mar 25 ii  i  i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Bertitaylor
12 Mar 25 ii  i  i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
11 Mar 25 ii  i  `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Bertitaylor
11 Mar 25 ii  i   `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Physfitfreak
9 Mar 25 ii  `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum8Jim Pennino
9 Mar 25 ii   +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum5Jim Pennino
9 Mar 25 ii   i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Jim Pennino
9 Mar 25 ii   i `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3bertietaylor
9 Mar 25 ii   i  +- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Jim Pennino
10 Mar 25 ii   i  `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Physfitfreak
31 Mar 25 ii   `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Physfitfreak
7 Apr 25 ii    `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
8 Mar 25 i`- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertietaylor
8 Mar 25 +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3Jim Pennino
27 Mar 25 i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum2Bertitaylor
28 Mar 25 i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Jim Pennino
10 Mar 25 `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum25David Canzi
10 Mar 25  +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum23bertitaylor
10 Mar 25  i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum22David Canzi
11 Mar 25  i +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum20Bertitaylor
12 Mar 25  i i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum19David Canzi
12 Mar 25  i i +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum14Bertitaylor
26 Mar 25  i i i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum13David Canzi
26 Mar 25  i i i `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum12Bertitaylor
26 Mar 25  i i i  +* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum8Johnny LaRue
26 Mar 25  i i i  i+* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Bertitaylor
27 Mar 25  i i i  i`* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3Peter Moylan
27 Mar 25  i i i  `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum3David Canzi
13 Mar 25  i i `* Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum4Peter Moylan
9 Apr 25  i `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor
10 Apr 25  `- Re: The antics of thermodynamics, the depravity of relativity, the bunkum of quantum1Bertitaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal