Re: Acceleration.

Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:

On 4/20/2025 5:30 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:

Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> wrote:

On 4/20/2025 4:43 PM, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

So, a simple (maybe even simple enough for
you) question.
An observer (Alice) is observing an object O
in the position of x. The velocity of the object
is 0, space is inflating. Does the position
change?
Yes or no.

>
Gibberish.

>
A dodge.
>

Positions have 3 coordinates.

>
Don't say... Really? So treat x as a vector
of 3 numbers. Whatever.
>

Velocity with respect to what?

>
To the observer.
>
>

Define "space is inflating".

>
Didn't your fellow idiots care?

>
Still rambling gibberish.

 
Still easier to wave arms and scream
"GIBBERISH!!!!" than to answer questions.

When you actually come up with cogent question...

 

>
And none of this has anything to do with Einstein's elevator.

 
But it has something to do with your
other assertion. Sorry, trash,"velocity
is the first derivative of position with
respect to time"  no longer holds in
that moronic mumble your moronic religion
is generating.

It appears you have no understanding of calculus or simple motion. That
velocity is the first derivative of position with respect to time is a
rather trivial observable.

Further, Einstein's elevator has nothing to do with velocity.

Einstein's elevator illustrates the principle of equivalence, showing
that the effects of gravity and acceleration are indistinguishable.


--
penninojim@yahoo.com