Re: The Orange One

On Sat, 24 May 2025 13:25:40 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Fri, 23 May 2025 13:24:06 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>

In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:

On Thu, 22 May 2025 13:54:24 +0000, occam wrote:
>

On 22/05/2025 02:00, Arindam's bitches wrote:
>

>
The Israelis and Indians evidently know what to do about crude missile
attacks.
>

>
Short range missiles. You detect, you shoot.
>
The discussion so far has been on long range missiles. Not the same
thing.

>
Arindam's new design rail gun can launch missiles at supersonic speeds.

>
You have reproduced something invented almost 200 years ago and your
version is capable of nothing more than rolling pipes at low speed,
crackpot.

>
No, not so, Pennino. Don't lie.
>
No one invented the low voltage heavy armature electromagnetic rail gun
design before Arindam Banerjee, who did it in 2015

>
The basic principal can be traced back to the work of Charles Wheatstone
in the 1840's, crackpot.
>
Using the principal to launch a projectile was demonstrated by André
Louis Octave Fauchon-Villeplée in 1917, crackpot.
>
<snip insane rant>

We are not talking old stuff here, dodgy liar. Totally irrelevant to
Arindam's astounding work that is completely original. No one ever did
such an experiment that by outing inertia revised the foundations of
dynamics.
They had and have no clue about the correct theory and implementation of
em rail guns. Which is why they have not worked.
 Arindam did it despite massive opposition. His rail gun is at least 10
to 100 times better than the failed conventional ones.
 As your kind has no shame let alone honour you continue to vilify
Arindam.
WOOF woof-woof woof woof woof-woof
Bertietaylor

>

--