Sujet : Re: The Apollo moon landings
De : jimp (at) *nospam* gonzo.specsol.net (Jim Pennino)
Groupes : sci.physicsDate : 10. Jun 2025, 03:53:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <hajkhl-iemn.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : tin/2.6.2-20220130 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.0-141-lowlatency (x86_64))
Bertitaylor <
bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 22:52:34 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
In sci.physics Bertitaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 16:45:44 +0000, David Canzi wrote:
>
On 6/7/25 18:23, Bertitaylor wrote:
Arindam remembers his father wondering after watching the Apollo moon
landing video in 1969, why they did not jump up at least three feet. He
also thought they could at least have thrown a stone up and thus show it
falling slowly.
>
When they jump, once their feet leave the surface, their acceleration is
determined by the gravity of whatever they jumped up from. If you
measure how high they jumped and how long it took to get to that height,
you can calculate their acceleration due to gravity and compare it with
the acceleration due to gravity at Earth's surface.
>
As they were on Earth they merely shuffled leaving deep prints.
>
Actually they all hopped around because it was good exercise and easier
to do than to walk in the bulky suits in low gravity, crackpot.
Hopping was shown as that could be done with cranes pulling them up or
down as per direction.
Insane nonsense.
Why did they not throw a moon rock UP and show how slowly it went up and
came down?
It wasn't on their schedule, they weren't teenagers on a joy ride to
make an internet video, and how fast a thrown object goes up has little
to nothing to do with gravity and almost everything to do with the
thrower.
You are getting more insane by the day.
<snip insane nonsense>
-- penninojim@yahoo.com