Re: OK, .. Let's see :-)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s physics 
Sujet : Re: OK, .. Let's see :-)
De : physfitfreak (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Physfitfreak)
Groupes : sci.physics
Date : 08. Jul 2025, 23:51:11
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Modern Human
Message-ID : <104k7d1$1v707$1@solani.org>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/8/25 5:12 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 7/8/25 4:14 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 7/8/25 2:54 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 7/8/25 1:41 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>
>
>
There is a list that compares the average IQ of each nation. For 2025 the top 75 highest IQ nations are listed as:
>
https://i.postimg.cc/fbrz4svn/photo-2025-07-07-09-23-29.jpg
>
>
As you see Iranians are now way up there but after China, South Korea, and Japan. USA is at the 30th place from the top (I have no doubt why), and Israelis are at the 45th place, which means compared to Iranians, they've got IQ's of thugs in the year 2025. Gee, wonder why.
>
Remember this is the average IQ. It says nothing about exceptions, or how far these exceptions are from the humanity's average (100) on both sides of the intelligence curve.
>
The highest IQ nation, China, has average IQ of 107.19
Iran, the fourth nation from the top, has average IQ of 106.3, placing them a good distance to the smarter side of the average human IQ of 100. And the dumbest nation in top 75 countries in the world is Romania with average IQ of 96.31.
>
Israel's is 99.07, and that's "07" in there after the radix, not "70". So generally, they're certainly dumber than humanity in general. Do you remember that I said this like 25 years back, right here, using obvious facts of history and applying reasoning and logic to them, and not by looking at statistical data? I knew already back then that they must be dumber than average human.
>
Also note that this score is for Israelis, not Jews. Only the dumber Jews end up in Israel. And generally, never think of Israelis as Jews. They are Nazis first, before being anything else. If you're a criminal, it doesn't matter what your religion is.
>
This list applies only to how things are in 2025. I don't believe I had seen Iran that far up in the list in earlier years. Iran's scientific and highly educated people have dramatically increased in the past 10 or 15 years.
>
If a country is more advanced than another, it won't mean their average IQ is higher than the other. For instance, India in 2025 is a more advanced country than Iran in science and tech both, and yet, their average IQ is much lower than that of Iranians (India is at 44th place, right above Israel). So being "advanced" has to do with the number of high IQ person in a country, not the average IQ in that country. India has such a high population that although the average IQ is low, still the number of high IQ individuals in that huge population exceeds those in Iran. USA has a similar situation also. The total number of high IQ individuals in USA is higher than those in Iran, therefore they are more advanced in science and tech.
>
But what _does_ this list say about those nations? It says the percentage of high IQ people inside total population of Iran is higher than that percentage in USA or India or Israel or .. and is only lower than that in Japan, South Korea, and China.
>
China is amazing in fact. Even in such a huge population, they have managed to keep percentage of scientists and generally high IQ people in there at the top that exists in the world. It really says something about their education system as well as management skills. And they have been up there at the top for some time too. Iran was not anywhere near the top before. Now she has made it to the 4th place. USA's and Israelis' places have been declining as anybody can notice without the help of a list like the above. One doesn't become a Nazi cause he's smart. There's only one way toward becoming a Nazi. The way down!
>
>
>
>
>
>
As far as the subject of Iran is concerned, Trump has so far in his term said nothing but the illusions in his mind and how he wished things were. He talks about them as if they're reality. That's his idea of "politics" and he and Netanyahu both do that only to fool their own people. They've decided in advance what to actually do about Iran, and the rest is show to fool Americans and European people.
>
The Sheep in the USA are so used to it that they consider that perfectly OK, and something that their president can do if he wants. They're not called the Sheep for no reasons.
>
And these leaders, they always pretend Iran's affairs don't matter, while I'd say it matters at least 10 times more than Ukraine's affairs ever mattered to them. Nazis are cowards in their cores. They always have huge numbers of Sheep to fool and suck.
>
In 1995 Iran had to ask Ukrainian scientists to help them with designing various stuff. Now, in the list of countries average IQ that I gave the link above, look it up one more time to find that Ukraine isn't even in that list; their position falls under the 75th from the top so didn't make it to the list. Why do you think any Nazi country is only looking at and concerned with Ukraine's everything other than its people? Mines, real estate, rivers, agricultural lands, etc. Because their people are the worst trash that cro-magnon species has offered. They're not even seen when Nazis are talking about "Ukraine."
>
>
Right after the end of the 12 day war, CIA decided that USA should pretend that China has distanced itself from Iran as a result of this war, while reality is the exact opposite. Iran ordered a first batch of the most modern Chinese fighter jets together with the associated surface to air missiles that work in unison against enemy aircraft. They're already delivered! And there's much more in the form of radars and other equipment that work in harmony with each other in a defensive war.
>
So obviously CIA (via their Arab servants in the region, and the Mossad) attempted to spread this lie exactly as yet another move to fool Americans and pave the way for what USA has decided for Iran. It was equivalent to one of Trump's own lies like this last one saying, "Iran has contacted him and asked for negotiations." Pure crap only to pretend to Americans that he tried the option of negotiation and it didn't work, therefore he has to go for another war with Iran.
>
I like that. I want a war between USA, Europe, Israel, and Iran. Just like the imposed war of 1980-1988. Why? I say it for the nth time, that I want the Nazis to suffer the consequences regardless of what happens to Iran. Iran will, one way or another, take care of herself. But you Nazis must pay something. I want you to pay that!
>
It is about time that you pay.
>
Arabs aren't going to force you to pay. Russians aren't going to force you to pay. China isn't going to force you to pay. They're just entities equivalent to "teenage entrepreneurs" and their young heads are still up their asses and do not care about existence of Nazis in the world. If they're left alone, they live on like there's no Nazi in the world.
>
But Iran can make you pay something for being Nazi :) And she will. It's not the first time either. Read my other blogs I posted during Covid years. We Iranians have been doing it to your Nazi asses since the Romans time!
>
This is not bullshit.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Speaking of China and Iran, I add that not only China is selling what Iran needs to have for adding jet fighters to her defenses, but the know-how associated with these aircraft and equipment are also shared with Iran, so no "reverse engineering" is required (unless to improve upon them) if Iran decides to manufacture them herself.
>
Iran is not alone in this, by the way. China has declared that all friendly countries to China (read that BRICS nations) are welcome to that technology and can purchase their defensive equipment and share the know-how in developing them.
>
So the actual use that Iran may see in them against war with Nazis can come very soon. This will be quite fast and just a matter of getting trained rather than development. But development phase of them will ensue alongside using them in a pinch.
>
Nothing will stop or wait or stall in Iran in matters of developing adequate defense. Including nukes.
>
Trump has been trying hard to make a bad word out of "nukes" in association with Iran. No, baby, "nukes" is the sweetest word Iranians have for your thick ass, Mr Dad's Bo.
>
Speaking of his thick ass, it turned out the comments by that cleric in East Azerbaijan province in Iran about Trump's "head" (and only head!) was true! Hehe :) But the thing about its insignificance is that it was not a Fatwa. He didn't have the position required to issue a Fatwa (it requires a Marja'). So it amounted to just a personal remark he made against the person of Mr Dad's Bo, and meaning it too. Iranians must be rejoiced by imagining him as a head only, with no other parts attached :-)
>
Goes well with using "bombs" to make a living, motherfucker.
>
>
>
>
>
  A bit more on BRICS.
 Note that the 10 nations that joined BRICS this week aren't full members yet. I believe their status is "partner", so they can collaborate but cannot vote yet. Only full members can vote.
 Turkey had tried hard to join a couple of years back but since they are essentially NATO, members did not offer membership to them. The only option that was offered to them was Partner, and even that only by India and China's initiative. No one else wanted them in. Then I didn't hear about Turkey after that. So I don't know if they accepted it or not.
 NATO is exactly the military force of the same entity that issues sanctions as its financial weapon. So .. it wouldn't make sense to have a NATO country enjoying a voice inside BRICS.
 Saudi Arabia was offered full membership alongside with Iran, etc. They had begun talking about getting independent of Nazis influence and had repaired their fiercely anti-Iranian stances in the region. BRICS founders wanted to give them a hand. But when the deadline came and passed, reality had kicked in (I don't know in what form, but it did) and Saudi Arabia was not in the list of new members. I don't know what happened. Either Saudis passively refused the membership under the pressure from Nazis, or members who had voted for them later changed their mind about the nature of Saudi Arabia as an independent country.
 So, still the fact is that Saudi Arabia is not a member of BRICS. There's also a chance that before the deadline comes they were offered a "Partner" status instead and Saudis didn't like that. Who knows.
 But generally Bitch countries aren't voted in as BRICS members. This rule is not absolute, as Emarate is a Bitch country and yet it is a member and can vote. Iran is of course a member.
 I think BRICS tries to first have the applied countries step into "Partner" status for a year or so, so BRICS can observe how they react under the assaults of Nazis on them to get them out. And only those who survive such assaults are then invited in as full members with voting right.
 There's one more stage other than membership and partner, which I don't remember what it's called. It is yet another status before a country is accepted as partner. That status is for allowing the curious countries to be there in BRICS and observe how it works and what the features are and what it can do, so they can then decide more wisely for applying for membership or not.
 So this whole process of becoming a member is nicely set.
 The most powerful members are China and India and Brazil. The Modern Human ones with huge population and huge prospects in the future. Russia's ass, like always, leaks some gas. They prefer it themselves that way. The collective cro-magnon senses doesn't leave them alone. Perhaps they know, alongside other cro-magnon nations, what is in store for them in the long-term future, and they hesitate to cooperate 100% genuinely with Modern Humans. They're afraid.
     
The evidences for what I said about Russia are all over if you look carefully.
The matter of Sukhoi-35 jets is still vividly in my mind and pisses me off when it comes up, and I'm just a casual lazy observer and never research these matters for more than a couple of minutes while I'm resting here in front of the computer. And the Sukhoi matter is just one example among many. Iran had asked for them many times and never got them, and at the same time Russians offered more than 100 of them to India who basically didn't even need them. Russians had even offered to sell them to NATO.
So as customers of their Sukhoi-35s, India, Turkey, Saudis, NATO all were fine with Russia, but Iran should not have them! This is where Russians are connected with Israel. They take Israel's side when matters of Israel and Iran come up.
So you can look at Russians as an entity that's part of it is Nazi, but only to Iran!. They will not let go of that part for the life of theirs EITHER. They have a Nazi feature in them reserved for Iran. That's why I don't think their presence in BRICS is that important. They can help but they can be pure burden too. It's all a matter of strategy.
I guess this comes with the territory. You can't have it all.
Iranians know Russians very well since at least 300 years back. We've seen what they are and what they can do and to what extent. They have fucked Iran up big time too here and there in that 300 years, and Iran has fucked them up even better a couple of times. The whole "Stalin" thing was what Iran threw at the Russian Empire. That's one of them. There are more!
Anyway, future will even out matters to some extent, hopefully. But great care is due regarding Russians, by the Iranians. You have to watch them and only get strategic help when available in dual benefit situations.
More evidences? Heh.. And the S-300s didn't work against Israeli jets either. And S-400s were denied! That's another couple of cases about what Russians can be towards Iran.
But Iran may have gotten the H-bomb secrets from them. Iran did get the design of Hoot torpedoes from them. So a resourceful neighbor is good to have, even a part-time Nazi one, but only if you're very careful about it.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Jul07:41 * OK, .. Let's see :-)8Physfitfreak
8 Jul20:54 +* Re: OK, .. Let's see :-)6Physfitfreak
8 Jul22:14 i`* Re: OK, .. Let's see :-)5Physfitfreak
8 Jul23:12 i `* Re: OK, .. Let's see :-)4Physfitfreak
8 Jul23:51 i  `* Re: OK, .. Let's see :-)3Physfitfreak
9 Jul01:08 i   `* Re: OK, .. Let's see :-)2Physfitfreak
9 Jul04:58 i    `- Re: OK, .. Let's see :-)1Physfitfreak
11 Jul08:45 `- Re: OK, .. Let's see :-)1Bertitaylor

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal