inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp research 
Sujet : inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)
De : dr.j.thornburg (at) *nospam* gmail-red.com (Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply])
Groupes : sci.physics.research
Date : 26. Feb 2025, 09:02:15
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <m28047FughsU1@mid.dfncis.de>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
[[I've changed the subject line since this discussion no longer has
anything to do with Hooke's law.]]

In article <vpd0kg$23r6$1@dont-email.me>, Luigi Fortunati writes:
In my animation https://www.geogebra.org/m/rs4cfxzg body A of 5 particles
collides inelastically with body B of 3 particles.


Before the collision, the total momentum p=+2 is entirely owned by
body A

This is incorrect: before the collision, *both* bodies have nonzero
momentum (relative to Luigi's inertial reference frame).  To be precise,
before the collision we have:
mass:        m_A = 5      m_B = 3
velocity:    v_A = +1     v_B = -1
momentum:    p_A = +5     p_B = -3      p_total = p_A+p_B = +2


After the collision, it is true that the total momentum does not change
(it always remains equal to p=+2), [[...]]
>
In fact, at the end of the collision, the positive momentum p=+2 belongs
"only" in part to body A (p=+1.25) and the rest has transferred to body B
(p=+0.75).

This is correct: since momentum is conserved, the total momentum after
the collision is equal to the total momentum before the collision, i.e.,
+2.  Since the total mass is m_A+m_B = 8, the common velocity after the
collision must be v_A = v_B = 0.25, and thus the two bodies' individual
momenta after the collision must be p_A = +1.25 and p_B = +0.75.


How is it possible that, during the collision, there is a transfer of
momentum from body A to body B if the action of body A on body B is
*equal* to the opposite reaction of body B on body A?

The answer is that the momentum transfer during the collision is actually
*two-way*, i.e., *each* body transfers some momentum to the other body.
That is, during the collision A's momentum changes (because B transfers
some momentum to A), AND B's momentum changes (because A transfers some
momentum to B).

Let's work this out in detail:
Before the collision:
   p_A_before = +5
   p_B_before = -3
   p_total_before = p_A_before+p_B_before = +2
After the collision:
  p_A_after = +1.25
  p_B_after = +0.75,
  p_total_after = p_A_after+p_B_after = +2
Thus, *during* the collision, the bodies momenta change by these amounts:
  Delta_p_A = p_A_after-p_A_before = -3.75
  Delta_p_B = p_B_after-p_B_before = +3.75
  Delta_p_total = Delta_p_A+Delta_p_B = 0

In other words, during the collison B transfers momentum -3.75 to A,
so that A's momentum changes by Delta_p_A=-3.75.  AND, during the
collision A transfers momentum +3.75 to B, so that B's momentum changes
by Delta_p_B=+3.75.


And why does this transfer of momentum from A to B not occur in the first
three instants and only occurs in instants 4 and 5?

To answer that we need to delve into the detailed internal structure of
each body and the dynamics of the collision.  I'll write about that in
a following posting.

--
-- "Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]" <dr.j.thornburg@gmail-red.com>
   (he/him; currently on the west coast of Canada)
   "[I'm] Sick of people calling everything in crypto a Ponzi scheme.
    Some crypto projects are pump and dump schemes, while others are pyramid
    schemes.  Others are just standard issue fraud.  Others are just middlemen
    skimming off the top.  Stop glossing over the diversity in the industry."
                                                 -- Pat Dennis, 2022-04-25

Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jan 25 * Newton e Hooke24Luigi Fortunati
30 Jan 25 +* Re: Newton e Hooke3Luigi Fortunati
5 Feb 25 i`* Re: Newton e Hooke2Luigi Fortunati
10 Feb 25 i `- Re: Newton e Hooke1Luigi Fortunati
12 Feb 25 `* Re: Newton e Hooke20Jonathan Thornburg [remove color- to reply]
14 Feb 25  `* Re: Newton e Hooke19Luigi Fortunati
16 Feb 25   +* Re: Newton e Hooke5Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
16 Feb 25   i`* Re: Newton e Hooke4Luigi Fortunati
17 Feb 25   i +* Re: Newton e Hooke2Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
17 Feb 25   i i`- Re: Newton e Hooke1Luigi Fortunati
18 Feb 25   i `- Re: Newton e Hooke1Tom Roberts
16 Feb 25   `* Re: Newton e Hooke13Luigi Fortunati
17 Feb 25    `* Re: Newton e Hooke12Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
18 Feb 25     `* Re: Newton e Hooke11Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
20 Feb 25      `* Re: Newton e Hooke10Luigi Fortunati
22 Feb 25       `* Re: Newton e Hooke9Luigi Fortunati
26 Feb 25        `* inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)8Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
28 Feb 25         `* Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)7Luigi Fortunati
1 Mar 25          +* Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)5Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
3 Mar 25          i`* Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)4Luigi Fortunati
12 Mar 25          i `* Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)3Luigi Fortunati
16 Mar 25          i  `* Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)2Luigi Fortunati
16 Mar 25          i   `- Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)1Luigi Fortunati
2 Mar 25          `- Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)1Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal