Sujet : Re: Newton's Gravity
De : fortunati.luigi (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Luigi Fortunati)
Groupes : sci.physics.researchDate : 14. Jan 2025, 18:12:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vm6932$2h42r$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Thomas Koenig il 14/01/2025 09:06:07 ha scritto:
Luigi Fortunati <fortunati.luigi@gmail.com> schrieb:
>
The consequence of all this is that the gravitational force of the
larger body of mass M acts on the entire mass <m> of the smaller body
and this justifies the product m*M of Newton's formula, which
corresponds to the force exerted by the larger mass M on the entire
mass <m>.
Instead, the gravitational force of the smaller body of mass <m> cannot
act on the entire body of mass M because M is larger
>
That is a non sequitur if there ever was one. Why should this be the
case?
>
Think of a mass M as being divided into i smaller submasses (all
with the same mass m_part) and of a mass j of being divided into
m smaller submasses with the same mass m_part. Which submass of M
should not interact all submasses of j?
You can divide the entire mass M of the Earth into as many sub-masses
as you want and it (as a whole) will continue to exert its
gravitational force on the entire mass <m> of my body (from which M*m
derives).
On the other hand, if you divide the mass <m> of my body into as many
sub-masses as you want, it (as a whole) will never be able to exert its
miserable gravitational force on *all* the immense mass <M> of the
Earth but will limit itself to the mass <m> of my room without going
beyond (so: not m*M but m*m).
Luigi Fortunati
[[Mod. note -- You've made a bunch of statements here. Do you have
any evidence for them? We do have a fair bit of experimental data
on Newtonian gravitation... are your statements consistent with the
experimental data?
-- jt]]