Re: Newton's Gravity

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp research 
Sujet : Re: Newton's Gravity
De : fortunati.luigi (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Luigi Fortunati)
Groupes : sci.physics.research
Date : 14. Jan 2025, 18:12:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vm6932$2h42r$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Thomas Koenig il 14/01/2025 09:06:07 ha scritto:
Luigi Fortunati <fortunati.luigi@gmail.com> schrieb:
>
The consequence of all this is that the gravitational force of the
larger body of mass M acts on the entire mass <m> of the smaller body
and this justifies the product m*M of Newton's formula, which
corresponds to the force exerted by the larger mass M on the entire
mass <m>.
 
Instead, the gravitational force of the smaller body of mass <m> cannot
act on the entire body of mass M because M is larger
>
That is a non sequitur if there ever was one.  Why should this be the
case?
>
Think of a mass M as being divided into i smaller submasses (all
with the same mass m_part) and of a mass j of being divided into
m smaller submasses with the same mass m_part. Which submass of M
should not interact all submasses of j?

You can divide the entire mass M of the Earth into as many sub-masses
as you want and it (as a whole) will continue to exert its
gravitational force on the entire mass <m> of my body (from which M*m
derives).

On the other hand, if you divide the mass <m> of my body into as many
sub-masses as you want, it (as a whole) will never be able to exert its
miserable gravitational force on *all* the immense mass <M> of the
Earth but will limit itself to the mass <m> of my room without going
beyond (so: not m*M but m*m).

Luigi Fortunati

[[Mod. note -- You've made a bunch of statements here.  Do you have
any evidence for them?  We do have a fair bit of experimental data
on Newtonian gravitation... are your statements consistent with the
experimental data?
-- jt]]

Date Sujet#  Auteur
31 Dec 24 * Newton's Gravity18Luigi Fortunati
1 Jan 25 +- Re: Newton's Gravity1Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
1 Jan 25 `* Re: Newton's Gravity16Luigi Fortunati
3 Jan 25  `* Re: Newton's Gravity15Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
5 Jan 25   `* Re: Newton's Gravity14Luigi Fortunati
6 Jan 25    `* Re: Newton's Gravity13Jens Schweikhardt
7 Jan 25     +- Re: Newton's Gravity1Luigi Fortunati
8 Jan 25     `* Re: Newton's Gravity11Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
8 Jan 25      +* Re: Newton's Gravity9Luigi Fortunati
11 Jan 25      i`* Re: Newton's Gravity8Luigi Fortunati
13 Jan 25      i `* Re: Newton's Gravity7Luigi Fortunati
14 Jan 25      i  +* Re: Newton's Gravity3Thomas Koenig
14 Jan 25      i  i`* Re: Newton's Gravity2Luigi Fortunati
15 Jan 25      i  i `- Re: Newton's Gravity1Luigi Fortunati
16 Jan 25      i  +- Re: Newton's Gravity1Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
16 Jan 25      i  `* Re: Newton's Gravity2Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
17 Jan 25      i   `- Re: Newton's Gravity1Luigi Fortunati
9 Jan 25      `- Re: Newton's Gravity1Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal