Re: Free fall

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp research 
Sujet : Re: Free fall
De : tjoberts137 (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Tom Roberts)
Groupes : sci.physics.research
Date : 25. Mar 2024, 10:14:06
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <Nb-dneIfCb6naJ37nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
On 3/24/24 3:29 PM, Luigi Fortunati wrote:
[Moderator] That is, the gravitational force on a body with
inertial mass 2 kg is (a) precisely twice that on a body with
inertial mass 1 kg,
 
But (if I'm not mistaken) (a) also applies to the electromagnetic
force which, on a 2-gram body of any material, is exactly double
that on a 1-gram body of any material. Is that so?

Not at all! -- If one is charged and one is not, the electromagnetic
forces on them will be VERY different.

I repeat: your approach of making false statements here and expecting to
be corrected is not working, and you are CLEARLY not learning much
physics, if any. You NEED to get some good textbooks and STUDY. Better
yet, enroll in a college or university physics course, so you will have
an instructor with whom you can discuss your many misconceptions and
confusions.

Tom Roberts

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Mar 24 * Re: Free fall8Luigi Fortunati
15 Mar 24 +* Re: Free fall2Mikko
24 Mar 24 i`- Re: Free fall1Luigi Fortunati
22 Mar 24 `* Re: Free fall5Luigi Fortunati
24 Mar 24  +* Re: Free fall3Luigi Fortunati
25 Mar 24  i+- Re: Free fall1Tom Roberts
25 Mar 24  i`- Re: Free fall1Luigi Fortunati
25 Mar 24  `- Re: Free fall1Luigi Fortunati

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal