Re: Equivalence principle

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp research 
Sujet : Re: Equivalence principle
De : fortunati.luigi (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Luigi Fortunati)
Groupes : sci.physics.research
Date : 13. Jun 2024, 10:29:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v4e3gq$24omn$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
Hendrik van Hees il 11/06/2024 10:46:14 ha scritto:
The first is that the accelerometer measures accelerations (and instead
it only measures forces) and the second is that free fall is an inertial
reference system despite its very evident mutual acceleration towards
the other body (also) in free fall.
I don't know, what's evident in your misconception. By definition bodies
which move without any interactions except the gravitational interaction
are by definition in free fall, and according to the equivalence
principle such bodies define a LOCAL (!!!!) inertial reference frame.

The inertial reference frame is one where no forces act.

In free fall, tidal forces act and, therefore, you and Einstein are
wrong when you say that free fall is an inertial reference (whether
local or non-local).

Luigi Fortunati

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Jun 24 * Equivalence principle9Luigi Fortunati
10 Jun 24 +* Re: Equivalence principle7Mikko
10 Jun 24 i+* Re: Equivalence principle5Hendrik van Hees
11 Jun 24 ii`* Re: Equivalence principle4Luigi Fortunati
11 Jun 24 ii `* Re: Equivalence principle3Hendrik van Hees
13 Jun 24 ii  `* Re: Equivalence principle2Luigi Fortunati
13 Jun 24 ii   `- Re: Equivalence principle1Hendrik van Hees
14 Jun 24 i`- Re: Equivalence principle1Luigi Fortunati
11 Jun 24 `- Re: Equivalence principle1Luigi Fortunati

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal