Energy - the "hot potato"?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp research 
Sujet : Energy - the "hot potato"?
De : ram (at) *nospam* zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram)
Groupes : sci.physics.research
Date : 18. Jun 2024, 19:25:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Stefan Ram
Message-ID : <Energy-20240618120905@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
  . Here's a quotation from "Quora":

|The vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field is just the
|value that we would "expect" it to have when it is in its
|vacuum state, which is the state of lowest energy. It turns
|out that it is a general law of nature that physical systems
|always "want" to be in the state of lowest possible energy.
|The allowed values for the energy are determined by the
|system's potential energy function. In the case of the Higgs
|field, the potential function looks (more or less) like this

  . My question is not about Higgs fields, but I'd like to focus
  on this part:

|It turns out that it is a general law of nature that physical
|systems always "want" to be in the state of lowest possible
|energy.

  . "Want" is not a very appropriate term in physics. But

  - is there really such a law? And if so,

  - how can one interpret this law in the way that the system
    "wants" to be in the state of the lowest possible energy?

  - If a system tries to get into a state of lowest energy,
    the only place it can give its energy to is another system,
    which also wants to get into a state of lowest energy . . .
    So it seems that the two systems are in a fight, each one
    trying to force its energy upon the other system then.
    What determines which system wins this fight?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Jun 24 * Energy - the "hot potato"?3Stefan Ram
19 Jun 24 `* Re: Energy - the "hot potato"?2Mikko
20 Jun 24  `- Re: Energy - the "hot potato"?1Stefan Ram

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal