Re: Newton's 3rd law is wrong

On 16-Sept-24 3:01 pm, Luigi Fortunati wrote:

I realize the enormity of the title of this article that refutes a law
that is more than three centuries old and that has never been contested
until now, but before presenting this work, I have carefully checked
all the concepts, numbers and formulas and I am ready to present this
article of mine in all other possible venues if it is rejected by
Physics Review.

The only way to refute a theory without the use of experimental evidence
is to show that it is internally inconsistent.

Since you have provided neither experimental evidence nor a
demonstration of an internal inconsistency, what you've presented is not
a refutation.

Sylvia.