Re: Newton e Hooke

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sp research 
Sujet : Re: Newton e Hooke
De : tjoberts137 (at) *nospam* sbcglobal.net (Tom Roberts)
Groupes : sci.physics.research
Date : 18. Feb 2025, 09:23:08
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <2e2cndAci9fnFi76nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
On 2/16/25 12:42 PM, Luigi Fortunati wrote:
[...] If you refuse to watch my animation [...]

I refuse to click on such links IN PRINCIPLE.

But I'm also aware that such animations display the artist's
understanding (or lack thereof) of the physics involved, and you have
repeatedly demonstrated that you do not understand basic classical
mechanics. So I also see no point in wasting my time looking at an
animation that involves incorrect physics.

I repeat: your "20 questions" approach to physics is useless. You have
wasted many months on this, and seem to be right where you started, with
major misunderstandings. You need to enroll in a university course on
the subject. Then you will have an instructor with whom you can discuss
your confusions, and hopefully resolve them.

Tom Roberts


Date Sujet#  Auteur
26 Jan 25 * Newton e Hooke24Luigi Fortunati
30 Jan 25 +* Re: Newton e Hooke3Luigi Fortunati
5 Feb 25 i`* Re: Newton e Hooke2Luigi Fortunati
10 Feb 25 i `- Re: Newton e Hooke1Luigi Fortunati
12 Feb 25 `* Re: Newton e Hooke20Jonathan Thornburg [remove color- to reply]
14 Feb 25  `* Re: Newton e Hooke19Luigi Fortunati
16 Feb 25   +* Re: Newton e Hooke5Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
16 Feb 25   i`* Re: Newton e Hooke4Luigi Fortunati
17 Feb 25   i +* Re: Newton e Hooke2Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
17 Feb 25   i i`- Re: Newton e Hooke1Luigi Fortunati
18 Feb 25   i `- Re: Newton e Hooke1Tom Roberts
16 Feb 25   `* Re: Newton e Hooke13Luigi Fortunati
17 Feb 25    `* Re: Newton e Hooke12Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
18 Feb 25     `* Re: Newton e Hooke11Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
20 Feb 25      `* Re: Newton e Hooke10Luigi Fortunati
22 Feb 25       `* Re: Newton e Hooke9Luigi Fortunati
26 Feb 25        `* inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)8Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
28 Feb 25         `* Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)7Luigi Fortunati
1 Mar 25          +* Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)5Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]
3 Mar 25          i`* Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)4Luigi Fortunati
12 Mar 25          i `* Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)3Luigi Fortunati
16 Mar 25          i  `* Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)2Luigi Fortunati
16 Mar 25          i   `- Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)1Luigi Fortunati
2 Mar 25          `- Re: inelastic collision (was: Re: Newton e Hooke)1Jonathan Thornburg [remove -color to reply]

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal