Sujet : Re: derivation of Newton's 3rd law from 2nd law
De : fortunati.luigi (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Luigi Fortunati)
Groupes : sci.physics.researchDate : 05. Jul 2025, 11:01:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <prth6k5ojfvgtgci6n13dm4beviaftaq30@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
On 4 Jul 2025 19:21:47 GMT, Tom Roberts <
tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net>
wrote:
...Cut...
Based on your other formulas, are the forces in the upper part of the
scheme correct or those in the lower part or are there others?
>
His physical situation has no "upper part" or "lower part"; it is
"1-dimensional motion". READ his post.
The upper or lower part does not concern "his physical situation" but
concerns my diagram
https://www.geogebra.org/classic/d2bxrrmg that you
evidently do not even look at.
So, what value can your objections to my animations and diagrams have
if you do not even look at them?
The experiment
Re: The experiment