Re: Western Press Infallibility

In article <6d1a4b97079e2800dfcb41f59c45a23b@www.novabbs.com>,
ltlee1 <ltlee1@hotmail.com> wrote:

In article <a0876da4b5de80c46ae8ec94523328e1@www.novabbs.com>,
ltlee1 <ltlee1@hotmail.com> wrote:

In article <1725108944.691998@nyx2.nyx.net>, bmoore <bmoore@nyx.net>
wrote:
>
You have said before that you don't listen to the Western press with
regard to China. Then you quote the >Western press as a reliable source
about beliefs of the Chinese people. Makes no sense.

>
I still don't believe Western press as a reliable source about China and
Chinese.
Why? Simply put. Their reports are often not supported by evidence.
>
In contrast, I have no problem quoting Western press concerning polls
answered by CHINESE CORRESPONDENTS.

What if the polls reported the oppposite of what you believe?

Especially those I could look at the polling organization's methodology
and resultant statistics myself.
>
In comparison, there were a lot of talks in the Western press on Chinese
Debt Trap. Where are the evidence and associated statistics? In their
absence, I have no reason to believe those reports.

What if the reports confirmed what you believe?

I feel like I am responding to illogical and inconsistent arguments here. It's been going on repetitively for decades.

Oh well.