Re: How prediction markets saw something the polls and pundits didn’t

Liste des GroupesRevenir à sc china 
Sujet : Re: How prediction markets saw something the polls and pundits didn’t
De : ltlee1 (at) *nospam* hotmail.com (ltlee1)
Groupes : soc.culture.china
Date : 09. Nov 2024, 13:55:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <d8e97055484bedc68d8af71869497031@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
The former is a team's mostly rational effort in collecting and then
turning collected information, more precise but less holistic, into
probability. In contrast, gamblers' approach is more holistic but more
ambiguous. Their action is also driven partly by emotion.
Accuracy of the approach reflects social trend. Gamblers' approach would
be a lot more reliable if the underlying society is under stress and
seeking change. Rational analysis based on the old model would be proven
to be wrong.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Nov 24 * How prediction markets saw something the polls and pundits didn’t2ltlee1
9 Nov 24 `- Re: How prediction markets saw something the polls and pundits didn’t1ltlee1

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal