Re: Facts are facts in religioworld.

chad wrote:
 

Michael Christ wrote:

On 2/04/2024 3:17 pm, Ted wrote:

Michael Christ wrote:
>

On 1/04/2024 4:33 am, Ted wrote:

Attila wrote:
>

On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 08:36:01 GMT, "Ted"
<ted.street@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<Rf9ON.599423$Ama9.194030@fx12.iad> wrote:
>

Attila wrote:
>

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:15:20 -0700, %
<pursent100@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<Y1ednah6SaOFNpX7nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com> wrote:
>

Attila wrote:

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:04:31 -0600, Skeeter
<skeeterweed@photonmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<66087e5f$0$2422115$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> wrote:
>

In article <_W_NN.118371$Sf59.9757@fx48.iad>,

ted.street@gmail.com >> >>> says...

>
Attila wrote:
>

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 19:49:13 GMT, "Ted"
<ted.street@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<Z0_NN.733311$xHn7.446799@fx14.iad> wrote:
>

Attila wrote:
>

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 05:19:37 GMT, "Ted"
<ted.street@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<JhNNN.132675$GX69.93730@fx46.iad> wrote:
>

Attila wrote:
>

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 12:27:17 +1100,
Maximus
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with

message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><l6p83oFbcupU1@mid.individual.net> wrote:

>

Attila wrote:

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:47:49
+1100, Maximus
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with

message-id >> >>>>>>>>>>> <l6mvfnFqj1U1@mid.individual.net>

wrote:

>

Attila wrote:

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024 10:10:48
+1100, Michael Christ
<michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism

with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>message-id <uu4tdq$3qcqp$5@dont-email.me>
wrote:

>

On 29/03/2024 9:18 am,
Attila wrote:

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024
08:57:19 +1100, Michael
Christ
<michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism

with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>message-id <uu4p41$3qcqp$3@dont-email.me>
wrote:

>

On 29/03/2024 8:26 am,
Attila wrote:

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024
08:11:38 +1100,
Michael

Christ >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in
alt.atheism with >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message-id
<uu4mec$3qcqp$1@dont-email.me> wrote:  >> > > > > > > > > > > >

>

>

On 29/03/2024
1:49 am,
Attila wrote:

On Thu, 28 Mar
2024 21:35:58
+1100, Michael

Christ >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in
alt.atheism >> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message-id
<uu3h6g$3h4v8$1@dont-email.me> >> wrote:

>

On 28/03/2024
9:21 pm, Attila
wrote:

On Wed, 27
Mar 2024
15:37:03
+1100, Michael

Christ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in
alt.atheism with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message-id
<uu07pf$2e2cl$1@dont-email.me> wrote:

>

Every
sermon in
Sinner
Christianity
is

false!  >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Why?
>
Because they
don't LIVE
what they
preach!
>
Simple.
>
Is there
anything
else more
obvious?

In
"Religoworld"
the
acceptable
facts are

defined >>>>> as >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> whatever fits the dogma of

the >>>>>>>month that is >>>>> being >> >> pushed.

>
Results vary
from person
to person.

Welcome to
planet Earth.

Michael Christ wrote:

How did you manage
to get to the age
you are and

be so >>>>>>>>> ignorant?  >>>>> Attila wrote:

It was easy.  I
wasted no time or
attention on

any >> >>>>> silly >> >> >>>>>>>> superstitions.

Michael Christ wrote:

Easy ignorance. Enough
said, then.

Attila trying to dig
himself out of his silly
hole,

wrote:  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignorance of something that interests

you >>>>>is >> a distinct >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advantage.

Just be on your way in your
"easy ignorance," Buddy,

and >>>>> take >> >> your silly >>>>> superstition (irrational

belief >> arising >>>>> from >> >> ignorance) with you.  >>>> No
belief is >> involved.  It is >>>>> more a >> lack >> of belief.

rejection of >> a belief is in itself >>>>> a belief.  >> >>

Nonsense.  Does >> rejection of collecting stamps >>>>> mean

not >> >>>>>>>>>collecting is >> a hobby?

>
how does one 'reject' collecting
stamps?  rejection is a

response >> to >> > an assertion. where is the assertion?

>
One does not collect stamps because
such collecting has

no >> >>>>>>>>> interest for him.  In the same way one ignores
superstition >> >>>>>>>>> because the subject does not interest

him.

>

>

>

Is not collecting stamps a
hobby?

that's about an activity
unrelated to any belief so

bad >> >>>>>>> analogy.  >> >> I would submit those who collect

stamps >>>>believe >>>>> they >> will >> >> gain satisfaction in
doing so.

>

>
that would only apply to someone
considering taking up

the >> >>>>> hobby >> of >> > collecting stamps. those who

collect >>>>>stamps do >> so >>>>> because they >> >> > enjoy it and
want to do >>>>>it. belief is >> not >>>>> involved.  >> >>

>

They do so because they are
interested in bits of colored paper.
If such bits do not interest them no
collecting

is >> >>>>>>>>> done.

>

>
>
I predict you'll regret not having
collected stamps when

you're >>>>> on >> > your death bed. You'd best have a

philatelist >>>>>at >> hand to pray >>>>> for >> > your soul.

>

>

>

I have yet to see any evidence that any
soul exists.

>
>
>
OMG, you're kidding, right? WTF do you
think it is that

holds >> you >>>>>> up, man??

>

>

Muscle and bone.

>
>
>
How ridiculous. When your soul leaves your
body, your muscle

and >> bone >>>> collapse to the ground because they're no longer
being >> supported by the >>>> soul. That's obvious.

>
and the muscle and bones are still there but the
soul isn't.

Good >> class, >>> well done.

>

>

You are assuming there was a "soul" there in the
first place.  What is your basis for that
assumption?
>

>

the beatles

>

>

Apparently you are unable to provide a rational answer
so you resort to attempted deflection and redirection.

>
>
>
You can't claim the Beatles weren't real. I remember
seeing them on Ed Sullivan. They were quite real. Do you
think Ed Sullivan was a myth too?

>

>

I remember seeing them on Jack Parr, their first American
appearance, but that has nothing to do with the existence or
non-existence of a soul.  They even don't accomplish a
misdirection or attempted change of subject very well.
>
They do however strongly emphasize a complete and total
failure to address the actual issue as well as a failure to
even attempt to answer the question asked.

>
>
The "actual issue", as I see it, is your implication that Ed
Sullivan was a myth!

>
Sheesh!
>
Everyone knows Ed Sullivan is alive and lives in a nursing home
settlement 40 miles south-east of the Brooklyn Bridge and is the
world's 2nd oldest person and will turn 123 years old on the
28th of September this year.
>
Who is the oldest? His mother is still alive at 141 years
young. She recently re-married for the 4th time a man half her
age. Apparently, he's a philatelist and has a gerontophilia
fetish.
>
>
Michael Christ

 

>
>
Was he in Australia?

 

>
Who? Ed? Or Cyril the philatelist with the gerontophilia fetish?
>
>
>
>
>
Michael Christ
>
>
>

 

What's your fetish, Mikey?

   Most of us aren't twisted pervs like you, Chad.