Re: Facts are facts in religioworld.

Michael Christ wrote:
 

On 2/04/2024 10:30 pm, Ted wrote:

Michael Christ wrote:

On 2/04/2024 7:17 pm, Ted wrote:

Michael Christ wrote:

On 2/04/2024 3:17 pm, Ted wrote:

Michael Christ wrote:
>

On 1/04/2024 4:33 am, Ted wrote:

Attila wrote:
>

On Sun, 31 Mar 2024 08:36:01 GMT, "Ted"
<ted.street@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<Rf9ON.599423$Ama9.194030@fx12.iad> wrote:
>

Attila wrote:
>

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:15:20 -0700, %
<pursent100@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with
message-id
<Y1ednah6SaOFNpX7nZ2dnZfqn_UAAAAA@giganews.com> wrote:
>

Attila wrote:

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 15:04:31 -0600, Skeeter
<skeeterweed@photonmail.com> in alt.atheism with

message-id

<66087e5f$0$2422115$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> wrote:
>

In article
<_W_NN.118371$Sf59.9757@fx48.iad>,

ted.street@gmail.com >> >>> says...

>
Attila wrote:
>

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 19:49:13 GMT, "Ted"
<ted.street@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<Z0_NN.733311$xHn7.446799@fx14.iad> wrote:
>

Attila wrote:
>

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 05:19:37 GMT,
"Ted"
<ted.street@gmail.com> in alt.atheism with message-id
<JhNNN.132675$GX69.93730@fx46.iad> wrote:
>

Attila wrote:
>

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 12:27:17
+1100, Maximus
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with

message-id >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><l6p83oFbcupU1@mid.individual.net>
wrote:

>

Attila wrote:

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024
15:47:49 +1100, Maximus
<gladiator@colosseum.rome> in alt.atheism with

message-id >> >>>>>>>>>>> <l6mvfnFqj1U1@mid.individual.net>

wrote:

>

Attila wrote:

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024
10:10:48 +1100, Michael
Christ
<michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in alt.atheism

with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>message-id <uu4tdq$3qcqp$5@dont-email.me>
wrote:

>

On 29/03/2024 9:18
am, Attila wrote:

On Fri, 29 Mar 2024
08:57:19 +1100,
Michael Christ
<michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in

alt.atheism  with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>message-id
<uu4p41$3qcqp$3@dont-email.me> wrote:

>

On 29/03/2024
8:26 am, Attila
wrote:

On Fri, 29 Mar
2024 08:11:38
+1100, Michael

Christ >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in
alt.atheism with >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message-id
<uu4mec$3qcqp$1@dont-email.me> wrote:  >> > > > > > > > > > >

>

>

On
29/03/20
24 1:49
am,
Attila
wrote:

On Thu, 28
Mar 2024
21:35:58
+1100,
Michael

Christ >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <michaelmclean2021@outlook.com>

in >>>>>>>>alt.atheism >> with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> message-id

<uu3h6g$3h4v8$1@dont-email.me> >> wrote:

>

On
28/03/2024
9:21 pm,
Attila
wrote:

On Wed,
27 Mar
2024
15:37:03
+1100,
Michael

Christ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

<michaelmclean2021@outlook.com> in >>>>>>>>>>alt.atheism with

message-id

<uu07pf$2e2cl$1@dont-email.me> wrote:

>

Every
sermon
in
Sinner
Christ
ianity
is

false!  >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Why?
>
Becaus
e
they
don't
LIVE
what
they
preach
!
>
Simple
.
>
Is
there
anythi
ng
else
more
obviou
s?

In
"Religow
orld"
the
acceptab
le
facts
are

defined >>>>> as >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> whatever fits the dogma

of  the >>>>>>>>>>month that is >>>>> being >> >> pushed.

>
Results
vary
from
person
to
person.

Welcome
to planet
Earth.

Michael Christ wrote:

How did you
manage to get
to the age
you are and

be so >>>>>>>>> ignorant?  >>>>> Attila wrote:

It was easy.  I
wasted no time
or attention on

any >> >>>>> silly >> >> >>>>>>>> superstitions.

Michael Christ wrote:

Easy ignorance.
Enough said, then.

Attila trying to dig
himself out of his
silly hole,

wrote:  >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ignorance of something that

interests you >>>>>>>>is >> a distinct >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> advantage.

Just be on your way
in your "easy
ignorance," Buddy,

and >>>>> take >> >> your silly >>>>> superstition

(irrational >>>>>>>>belief >> arising >>>>> from >> >> ignorance)
with you.  >>>> No >>>>>>>>belief is >> involved.  It is >>>>> more a

lack >> of belief.  >>>>>>>>>>>rejection of >> a belief is in

itself >>>>> a belief.  >> >> >> >>>>>>>>Nonsense.  Does >> rejection
of collecting stamps >>>>> mean not >> >>>>>>>>>>>>collecting is >> a
hobby?

>
how does one 'reject'
collecting stamps?  rejection
is a

response >> to >> > an assertion. where is the

assertion?

>
One does not collect stamps
because such collecting has

no >> >>>>>>>>> interest for him.  In the same way one ignores
superstition >> >>>>>>>>> because the subject does not

interest  him.

>

>

>

Is not collecting
stamps a hobby?

that's about an activity
unrelated to any belief so

bad >> >>>>>>> analogy.  >> >> I would submit those who

collect >>>>>>stamps >>>>believe >>>>> they >> will >> >> gain
satisfaction in

doing so.

>

>
that would only apply to
someone considering taking up

the >> >>>>> hobby >> of >> > collecting stamps. those who

collect >>>>>>>>stamps do >> so >>>>> because they >> >> > enjoy it
and want to do >>>>>>>>it. belief is >> not >>>>> involved.  >> >>

>

They do so because they are
interested in bits of colored
paper.  If such bits do not
interest them no collecting

is >> >>>>>>>>> done.

>

>
>
I predict you'll regret not
having collected stamps when

you're >>>>> on >> > your death bed. You'd best have a

philatelist >>>>>>>>at >> hand to pray >>>>> for >> > your soul.

>

>

>

I have yet to see any evidence that
any soul exists.

>
>
>
OMG, you're kidding, right? WTF do
you think it is that

holds >> you >>>>>> up, man??

>

>

Muscle and bone.

>
>
>
How ridiculous. When your soul leaves
your body, your muscle

and >> bone >>>> collapse to the ground because they're no

longer >>>>>>>>being >> supported by the >>>> soul. That's obvious.

>
and the muscle and bones are still there
but the soul isn't.

Good >> class, >>> well done.

>

>

You are assuming there was a "soul" there in
the first place.  What is your basis for that
assumption?
>

>

the beatles

>

>

Apparently you are unable to provide a rational
answer so you resort to attempted deflection and
redirection.

>
>
>
You can't claim the Beatles weren't real. I
remember seeing them on Ed Sullivan. They were
quite real. Do you think Ed Sullivan was a myth too?

>

>

I remember seeing them on Jack Parr, their first
American appearance, but that has nothing to do with
the existence or non-existence of a soul.  They even
don't accomplish a misdirection or attempted change
of subject very well.
>
They do however strongly emphasize a complete and
total failure to address the actual issue as well as
a failure to even attempt to answer the question
asked.

>
>
The "actual issue", as I see it, is your implication
that Ed Sullivan was a myth!

>
Sheesh!
>
Everyone knows Ed Sullivan is alive and lives in a
nursing home settlement 40 miles south-east of the
Brooklyn Bridge and is the world's 2nd oldest person and
will turn 123 years old on the 28th of September this
year.
>
Who is the oldest? His mother is still alive at 141 years
young. She recently re-married for the 4th time a man
half her age. Apparently, he's a philatelist and has a
gerontophilia fetish.
>
>
Michael Christ

>
>
Was he in Australia?

>
Who? Ed? Or Cyril the philatelist with the gerontophilia
fetish?
>
>
>
>
>
Michael Christ
>

  >
  >
What's your fetish, Mikey?

>
People like you.
>
>
Michael Christ
>
>
>

 

Do you prefer me as Ted or as Alice?

 

>
I would prefer you to be who you are.
>
>
>
Michael Christ

   Chad would prefer to be someone else. That's why he frogs his superiors.