Kto jeździ, jeździł, testował Teslę i chce wiedzieć, na ile unikanie kolizji działa

Forward Collision Warning and Automatic Emergency Braking Systems
against a Stationary Pedestrian Target
Ten system to był wielki sukces Tesli 10 lat temu, że jedziesz, jedziesz
i nie najeżdżasz na zderzaki samochodów przed sobą, bo system włącza
automatyczne hamowanie.
To była genialna innowacja 10 lat temu, ale do dzisiaj wydarzyło się
kilkaset wypadków, potrąceń pieszych na przejściach i system nie
zadziałał.
Badanie systemu przeprowadziło Amerykanskie Stoarzyszenie Inżynierów
Samochodowych, ale raport nie ma statusu dokumentu poblicznego, czyli
kierowcy Tesli nie mają z niego żadnego pożytku.
An Assessment of the Tesla Model 3's Forward Collision Warning and
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems against a Stationary Pedestrian
Target
2024-01-2482
04/09/2024
Description
View
Data Sets
References
Citation
Features
Event
    WCX SAE World Congress Experience
Authors
Shawn Harrington
Forensic Rock
Sundar Raman Nagarajan
Forensic Rock
James Lau
Racelogic USA
Abstract
Content
    A total of 93 tests were conducted in daytime conditions to evaluate
the effect on the Time to Collision (TTC), emergency braking, and
avoidance rates of the Forward Collision Warning (FCW) and Automatic
Emergency Braking (AEB) provided by a 2022 Tesla Model 3 against a
4ActivePA adult static pedestrian target. Variables that were evaluated
included the vehicle speed on approach, pedestrian offsets, pedestrian
clothing, and user-selected FCW settings. As a part of the Tesla’s
Collision Avoidance AssistTM, these user-selected FCW settings change
the timing of the issuance of the visual and/or audible warning
provided. This testing evaluated the Tesla at speeds of 25 and 35 miles
per hour (mph) versus a stationary pedestrian target in early, medium,
and late FCW settings. Testing was also conducted with a 50% pedestrian
offset and 75% offset conditions relative to the right side of the
Tesla. The pedestrian target was clothed with and without a reflective
safety vest to account for different conspicuity during the testing. The
TTC at FCW and AEB, emergency braking deceleration and the avoidance
rates were compared between different settings and test parameters. The
test data was also compared against the IIHS pedestrian tests at
different speeds and scenarios.
Meta Tags
Topics
    Collision warning systems
    Collision intervention systems
    Crashes
    Braking systems
    Data exchange
    Adults
    Visibility
Affiliated or Co-Author
    Forensic Rock
    Racelogic USA
Details
DOI
    https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-01-2482
Pages
    19
Citation
    Harrington, S., Nagarajan, S., and Lau, J., "An Assessment of the
Tesla Model 3's Forward Collision Warning and Automatic Emergency
Braking Systems against a Stationary Pedestrian Target," SAE Technical
Paper 2024-01-2482, 2024, https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-01-2482.
https://saemobilus.sae.org/papers/assessment-tesla-model-3s-forward-collision-warning-automatic-emergency-braking-systems-a-stationary-pedestrian-target-2024-01-2482
Kolejne badanie zapowiedziała Federalna Agencja Bezpieczeństwa
Autostradowego i chce wezwania do serwisów 2,4 mln. wadliwych Tesli.
Ale procedura jest znana i stara i producent zdalnie wproadzi upgrade
softu w samochodach i recall zakończy się niczym.
Ale dla indywidualnego kierowcy ważne jednak jest, aby jego Tesla nikogo
nie przejechała, na żaden samochód nie najechała i Autopilot ma działać
zawsze prawidłowo i zapobiegać wypadkom.
Czyl;i systemów bezpieczensta przybywa, ale wypadki nadal się zdarzaja i
nikt nie zna przyczyny, dlaczego systemy nie zadziałały.
I tym właśnie się zajmuję.
https://youtu.be/QZ7vziuw420
https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/nhtsa-opens-probe-into-24-mln-tesla-vehicles-over-full-self-driving-collisions-2024-10-18/
The agency is asking if other similar FSD crashes have occurred in
reduced roadway visibility conditions, and if Tesla has updated or
modified the FSD system in a way that may affect it in such conditions.
NHTSA said the "review will assess the timing, purpose, and capabilities
of any such updates, as well as Tesla’s assessment of their safety
impact," the agency said.
Tesla's FSD technology has been in development for years and aims for
high automation, where its vehicle can handle most driving tasks without
human intervention.
Tesla in December recalled more than two million U.S. vehicles to
install new safeguards in its Autopilot advanced driver-assistance
system. NHTSA is still probing whether that recall is adequate to
address concerns drivers are not paying attention.
Tesla disclosed in October 2023 that the U.S. Justice Department issued
subpoenas related to its FSD and Autopilot systems. Reuters reported in
October 2022 that Tesla was under criminal investigation.
There have been at least two fatal accidents involving the FSD
technology, including an incident in April in which a Tesla Model S car
was in FSD mode when it hit and killed a 28-year-old motorcyclist in the
Seattle area.
Tesla's "camera-only" approach to partially and fully autonomous driving
systems, some industry experts have said, could cause issues in
low-visibility conditions as the vehicles do not have a set of back-up
sensors.
"Weather conditions can impact the camera's ability to see things and I
think the regulatory environment will certainly weigh in on this," said
Jeff Schuster, vice president at GlobalData.
"That could be one of the major roadblocks in what I would call a
near-term launch of this technology and these products," he said of
Tesla's robotaxis.
Tesla's rivals that operate robotaxis rely on expensive sensors such as
lidar and radar to detect driving environments.