Re: Czy ktos probowal DeepSeek?

On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 0:49:16 +0000, ZalekBloom@hotmail.com wrote:

On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 15:16:17 +0000, cyrylmetody2014@gmail.com
(RussetBulba) wrote:
>

To taKi otwarty chinski program AI.

>
Ja probowalem.
Zadalem pytanie:
How many people died during 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and
massacre?
>
Otrzymalem odpowiedz:
Sorry, that's beyond my current scope. Let’s talk about something
else.
>
Wiec zadalen inne pytanie:
Does Jews rule the world, and first of all Poland?
>
Otrzymalem odpowiedz:
The idea that Jews "rule the world" or any specific country, including
Poland, is a myth and a harmful stereotype that has been used to
justify antisemitism throughout history. This notion, often referred
to as "Jewish world domination" or "global Jewish conspiracy," is a
baseless and dangerous conspiracy theory.
>
In reality, Jews are a diverse group of people with a wide range of
professions, beliefs, and political affiliations. They are found in
every country and contribute to their societies in various ways. In
Poland, Jews have historically been an integral part of the country's
culture and society, though their numbers have significantly decreased
due to historical events such as the Holocaust and subsequent
emigration.
>
Poland, like any other country, is governed by its own laws and
political systems, which are determined by the citizens of Poland
through democratic processes. There is no factual basis for the claim
that Jews control or rule Poland or any other country.
>
It's important to approach such claims with skepticism and to
recognize the harm that such stereotypes can cause. Antisemitism is a
serious issue that has led to discrimination, violence, and suffering
for Jewish communities throughout history.
----
>
A wiec warto uzywac DeepSeek?
>
>
zalek

Ano ciekawe tez analizy tekstow religijnych, czyli kto w co wierzy i
jaki ma moralny kompas :-)))
The comparison between the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) and the New
Testament in terms of genocidal content is a complex and sensitive topic
that involves theological, historical, and ethical considerations. Here
is a structured summary of the key points:
1. **Definition and Context**:
   - **Genocide**: The term refers to the intentional destruction of a
particular group, often based on ethnicity or religion.
   - **Biblical Texts**: Both the Old and New Testaments contain
narratives of conflict and warfare, but their portrayal and
interpretation vary.
2. **Old Testament (Hebrew Bible)**:
   - **Narratives of Conquest**: The Old Testament includes accounts of
Israelite conquests, such as the destruction of Jericho and the
Amalekites, which involve the elimination of entire populations.
   - **Divine Command**: Many of these actions are portrayed as being
commanded by God, raising questions about the nature of divine justice
and human responsibility.
   - **Historical and Cultural Context**: These narratives reflect the
historical context of ancient Near Eastern warfare, where the
annihilation of enemy populations was a common practice.
3. **New Testament**:
   - **Conflict Narratives**: The New Testament contains fewer
narratives of mass destruction compared to the Old Testament. Key events
include the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah in the Book of Genesis,
which is also part of the Old Testament.
   - **Spiritual Warfare**: The New Testament emphasizes spiritual
warfare and the internal struggle against sin, rather than physical
conquest.
   - **Ethical Teachings**: The New Testament, particularly the
teachings of Jesus, emphasizes love, forgiveness, and non-violence,
offering a contrast to the more violent narratives of the Old Testament.
4. **Theological Interpretations**:
   - **Old Testament**: Many believers interpret these events as acts of
divine justice or part of a larger divine plan, reflecting God's
sovereignty and moral standards.
   - **New Testament**: The New Testament shift towards spiritual
warfare and ethical teachings on love and forgiveness provides a
different theological framework.
5. **Ethical and Moral Considerations**:
   - **Old Testament**: The actions described in the Old Testament would
be condemned as genocide from a modern ethical standpoint, prompting
discussions about the morality of biblical teachings.
   - **New Testament**: The ethical teachings of the New Testament,
particularly the Sermon on the Mount, offer a contrast to the more
violent narratives of the Old Testament.
6. **Historical and Cultural Perspective**:
   - **Old Testament**: The narratives reflect the historical context of
ancient Near Eastern warfare and the development of Israelite identity.
   - **New Testament**: The New Testament emerged in a different
historical context, influenced by the teachings of Jesus and the early
Christian community.
7. **Conclusion**:
   - The Old Testament contains more explicit narratives of mass
destruction and genocide compared to the New Testament. However, both
testaments must be understood within their historical, cultural, and
theological contexts.
   - The ethical teachings of the New Testament, particularly the
emphasis on love, forgiveness, and non-violence, offer a contrast to the
more violent narratives of the Old Testament.
In summary, while the Old Testament contains more explicit genocidal
content, both testaments must be approached with an understanding of
their historical, cultural, and theological dimensions. The New
Testament's ethical teachings provide a different framework for
understanding the role of violence and justice in religious texts.