Sujet : Re: holes in the whole ?
De : invalide (at) *nospam* invalid.invalid (Pro Plyd)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 19. Jun 2025, 04:27:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Amateur Plyd
Message-ID : <1030032$3lcnj$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
RonO wrote:
On 6/17/2025 3:01 AM, jillery wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 17:39:57 -0400, Dale <dalekellytoo@gmail.com>
>
https://www.dalekelly.org/godhead.html
>
Are there no holes in the whole ?
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheism
>
Or are there holes in the whole ?
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panentheism
>
Impermanence in definition ?
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impermanence
>
https://www.dalekelly.org/
>
The whole has holy holes.
>
"Holy holes Batman!"
Wholey mackeral!
"There's a whole in the bucket,
dear Liza, dear Liza,
A whole in the bucket,
dear Liza a whole"
Well that's a whole in one!
holes in the whole ?
Re: holes in the whole ?