Sujet : Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"
De : jtem01 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (JTEM)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 28. Jun 2025, 12:41:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Eek
Message-ID : <103okdv$r5p5$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 6/28/25 5:42 AM, jillery wrote:
Words have multiple meanings.
No. This is a scientific context. Ambiguity is the last thing
anyone can tolerate.
Plus you're just being mental here, digging in your heels and
refusing to acknowledge reality.
There is no Fermi "Paradox." STOP being a mindless follower
for once in that miserable excuse for a life, and think for
yourself.
"No! Status Quo ordered me to think 'Paradox' so I must!"
-- https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5
There is NO Fermi "Paradox"
Re: There is NO Fermi "Paradox"