Re: West Virginia creationism

Vincent Maycock wrote:

On Tue, 9 Apr 2024 23:15:45 -0400, Ron Dean
<rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
 

jillery wrote:

<snip>

DNA information comes from none of the sources you identified above,
therefore it doesn't exist.  QED.
>

Each and every source of the information I mentioned, this information
involves the mind.
Information exist, and since it does, since there's no exception, then
it follows that information contained in DNA must also come from a mind.
Accidental, mindless, random processes give nothing, but gibberish.
Where there's nothing, but gibberish there is nothing for which natural
selection can select.

 Without natural selection, information in the genome indeed becomes
gibberish.

 >
I said nothing about natural selection not existing - it does. But it conserves.
 >
  But with natural selection, something that's by chance  a

little bit less gibberish is preserved, so that over time there is
much, much more coherent information in the genome than before.
 

Why is any part of gibberish preserved? What "tells" NS that this bit of gibberish will be needed later? If gibberish is not needed why doesn't the DNA's edit and repair systems not cut out this bit of gibberish?

<snip>