Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!
De : eastside.erik (at) *nospam* gmail.com (erik simpson)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 28. Mar 2024, 18:15:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : University of Ediacara
Message-ID : <3121664b-b1b3-484b-be92-ec3e50c8c52c@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/28/24 10:06 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
On 2024-03-28 16:52:50 +0000, Mark Isaak said:
 
On 3/26/24 10:29 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
Mark Isaak wrote:
On 3/25/24 10:26 AM, Ron Dean wrote:
Mark Isaak wrote:
On 3/23/24 4:31 PM, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
Ron Dean <rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
Mark Isaak wrote:
>
[snip
>
And what about people for whom theism is their greatest motivator, such
as Obama bin Laden? Cynicism seems a rational response.
>
Are you suggesting that Obama bin Laden is typical of Islam? If so,
you're probably right.
>
My apologies to Mark as I just Chez Watted this without realizing Mark had
originally posted Osama bin Laden and in Ron Dean’s reply Mark’s spelling
morphed to Obama bin Laden matching Ron Dean’s spelling. I wonder what that
indicates about Ron Dean…
>
Even without the typo, Ron's reply shows that he is grossly bigoted against Arabs and Moslems. The typo suggests that Blacks and Democrats may be added to the list.
>
Here you are so unfair.  It's easy to make accusations and charges without even attempting to support them. This in and of itself demonstrates your extreme bias and hatred of anyone with a
point of view, opinion or belief different from yours.
>
The support for your bigotry against Moslems is in your own post, and that bigotry in turn is support for a suggestion of further bigotry. I must admit that I had not considered the intervention of a spell-checker. I have never known a spell-checker, uninvited, to alter text that the user did not type himself.
>
I asked a question. "Are you suggesting that Osama bin Laden is typical of Islam? If so (if you confirmed) you are probably right". If you failed. I placed the burden on you! (Note here I defeated my spell-checker)
>
Do you honestly not recognize the overt bigotry in what you just repeated? It is really extremely gross and unforgivable.
 All the Muslims that I know (all highly educated women, at the moment) are perfectly decent people. All of them would be very insulted to be described as typical of Osama Ben Laden. None of them wear veils. A few years ago there was a student who did wear a veil, but that was only in her second when her husband came to join the institute. In her first year she didn't, and was perfectly happy to have her photo taken (by me) for a seminar series that my wife was organizing. She likewise had nothing in common with Osama Ben Laden.
 
It seems to me that Ron D has been getting an undue amount of attention for some time.  He obviously has a problem with reading not only what others have written, but also in reading what he has written himself. We are all getting bogged down with this unending drizzle.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
13 Mar 24 * Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!142Ron Dean
13 Mar 24 `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!141jillery
14 Mar 24  `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!140Ron Dean
15 Mar 24   `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!139jillery
17 Mar 24    `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!138Ron Dean
17 Mar 24     +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!22erik simpson
17 Mar 24     i`* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!21Dexter
18 Mar 24     i `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!20Ron Dean
18 Mar 24     i  +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!6John Harshman
18 Mar 24     i  i+- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Kerr-Mudd, John
18 Mar 24     i  i`* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!4Ron Dean
18 Mar 24     i  i +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!2Kerr-Mudd, John
18 Mar 24     i  i i`- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1J. J. Lodder
18 Mar 24     i  i `- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1John Harshman
18 Mar 24     i  +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!8jillery
18 Mar 24     i  i+* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!6erik simpson
18 Mar 24     i  ii+* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!4Bob Casanova
18 Mar 24     i  iii+* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!2Athel Cornish-Bowden
19 Mar 24     i  iiii`- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Bob Casanova
20 Mar 24     i  iii`- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1JTEM
20 Mar 24     i  ii`- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1jillery
18 Mar 24     i  i`- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Ron Dean
19 Mar 24     i  `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!5Dexter
19 Mar 24     i   `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!4Ron Dean
20 Mar 24     i    `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!3jillery
20 Mar 24     i     `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!2Ron Dean
21 Mar 24     i      `- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1jillery
17 Mar 24     +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!28Ernest Major
18 Mar 24     i`* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!27Ron Dean
18 Mar 24     i +- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Vincent Maycock
18 Mar 24     i +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!10jillery
18 Mar 24     i i`* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!9Ron Dean
20 Mar 24     i i `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!8jillery
20 Mar 24     i i  `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!7Ron Dean
20 Mar 24     i i   +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!2Kerr-Mudd, John
21 Mar 24     i i   i`- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Ron Dean
21 Mar 24     i i   +- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1jillery
21 Mar 24     i i   +- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Mark Isaak
22 Mar 24     i i   `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!2Burkhard
23 Mar 24     i i    `- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Ron Dean
19 Mar 24     i `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!15Mark Isaak
19 Mar 24     i  `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!14Ron Dean
19 Mar 24     i   +- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Ernest Major
20 Mar 24     i   `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!12Mark Isaak
20 Mar 24     i    `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!11Ron Dean
21 Mar 24     i     +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!4jillery
21 Mar 24     i     i`* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!3Ron Dean
22 Mar 24     i     i `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!2jillery
22 Mar 24     i     i  `- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1erik simpson
21 Mar 24     i     `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!6Mark Isaak
21 Mar 24     i      `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!5Ron Dean
22 Mar 24     i       +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!2Mark Isaak
23 Mar 24     i       i`- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Ron Dean
22 Mar 24     i       `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!2Burkhard
22 Mar 24     i        `- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Ernest Major
18 Mar 24     `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!87jillery
20 Mar 24      `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!86Ron Dean
21 Mar 24       `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!85jillery
21 Mar 24        `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!84Ron Dean
22 Mar 24         +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!5jillery
23 Mar 24         i`* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!4Ron Dean
23 Mar 24         i `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!3jillery
25 Mar 24         i  `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!2Ron Dean
25 Mar 24         i   `- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1jillery
22 Mar 24         +- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Burkhard
22 Mar 24         +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!58Ernest Major
23 Mar 24         i`* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!57Ron Dean
23 Mar 24         i `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!56Mark Isaak
24 Mar 24         i  +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!53Ron Dean
24 Mar 24         i  i+* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!39*Hemidactylus*
24 Mar 24         i  ii+* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!2DB Cates
24 Mar 24         i  iii`- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1jillery
24 Mar 24         i  ii+* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!10Athel Cornish-Bowden
24 Mar 24         i  iii`* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!9Ron Dean
24 Mar 24         i  iii `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!8*Hemidactylus*
24 Mar 24         i  iii  `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!7Ron Dean
24 Mar 24         i  iii   `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!6*Hemidactylus*
24 Mar 24         i  iii    `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!5Ron Dean
24 Mar 24         i  iii     +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!3*Hemidactylus*
25 Mar 24         i  iii     i`* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!2jillery
25 Mar 24         i  iii     i `- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Ron Dean
25 Mar 24         i  iii     `- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1jillery
25 Mar 24         i  ii`* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!26Mark Isaak
25 Mar 24         i  ii `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!25Ron Dean
26 Mar 24         i  ii  `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!24Mark Isaak
26 Mar 24         i  ii   +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!3*Hemidactylus*
26 Mar 24         i  ii   i+- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Ron Dean
27 Mar 24         i  ii   i`- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1jillery
26 Mar 24         i  ii   `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!20Ron Dean
28 Mar 24         i  ii    `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!19Mark Isaak
28 Mar 24         i  ii     +* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!11Athel Cornish-Bowden
28 Mar 24         i  ii     i+* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!3erik simpson
28 Mar 24         i  ii     ii+- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Martin Harran
29 Mar 24         i  ii     ii`- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1jillery
28 Mar 24         i  ii     i+* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!6Martin Harran
29 Mar 24         i  ii     ii`* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!5Ron Dean
29 Mar 24         i  ii     ii `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!4Martin Harran
29 Mar 24         i  ii     ii  `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!3Ron Dean
29 Mar 24         i  ii     ii   `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!2Martin Harran
29 Mar 24         i  ii     ii    `- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Ernest Major
29 Mar 24         i  ii     i`- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Ron Dean
29 Mar 24         i  ii     `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!7Ron Dean
24 Mar 24         i  i+* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!12Burkhard
25 Mar 24         i  i`- Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!1Mark Isaak
24 Mar 24         i  `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!2*Hemidactylus*
23 Mar 24         `* Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!19Chris Thompson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal