Re: Ool - out at first base?

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: Ool - out at first base?
De : eastside.erik (at) *nospam* gmail.com (erik simpson)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 14. Dec 2024, 22:42:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : University of Ediacara
Message-ID : <4fce68c6-b1dc-45ca-867b-169d765e63e0@gmail.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/14/24 11:53 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 17:52:14 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Martin Harran
<martinharran@gmail.com>:
 
On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 08:46:26 -0800, erik simpson
<eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On 12/14/24 8:23 AM, DB Cates wrote:
On 2024-12-14 6:04 a.m., MarkE wrote:
[big snip]
>
>
Christian de Duve put it this way: "Science is based on the working
hypothesis that things are naturally explainable. This may or may not
be true. But the only way to find out is to make every possible effort
to explain things naturally. Only if one fails - assuming failure can
ever be definitely established - would be entitled to state that what
one is studying is not naturally explainable."
>
That seems close what to what I'm proposing. Thoughts?
>
For argument's sake, let's say that is true.
Now, how do you get from 'OoL is supernatural' to the Christian god or
indeed any god at all? I suppose we could call it the 'god of OoL' but
now what else do we know about this 'god'?
>
If it's explainable, there's little difference between invoking god(s)
or looking for natural causes.  Many scientists believe in god, and
you're in good company with Issac Newton, probably the best physicist
who ever lived. He explained things that many believed inexplicable.
>
According to MarkE's logic he shouldn't have bothered trying to
explain them in the first place because nobody been able to explain
them over thousands of years so they had to be inexplicable by natural
means and therefore had to be supernatural!
>
I.e., the same class of "logic" propounded by a (thankfully
long absent) poster here who insisted that people today are
more intelligent than those in ancient Egypt, because we
have cell phones and they didn't.
 (Actually, I'm tempted to argue the opposite, after watching
various "cellphone zombies" start to walk into traffic...)
>
Actually people have been getting dumber since ancient Egypt.  Medical treatment is much more effective, and defective (in all ways) people now survive.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
9 Dec 24 * OoL – out at first base?119MarkE
9 Dec 24 +* Re: OoL – out at first base?18erik simpson
9 Dec 24 i`* Re: OoL – out at first base?17MarkE
9 Dec 24 i `* Re: OoL – out at first base?16erik simpson
10 Dec 24 i  +* Re: OoL – out at first base?3MarkE
10 Dec 24 i  i+- Re: OoL – out at first base?1erik simpson
10 Dec 24 i  i`- Re: OoL – out at first base?1jillery
11 Dec 24 i  +* Re: OoL – out at first base?2MarkE
11 Dec 24 i  i`- Re: OoL – out at first base?1erik simpson
11 Dec 24 i  `* Re: OoL - out at first base?10Martin Harran
11 Dec 24 i   +* Re: OoL - out at first base?7erik simpson
11 Dec 24 i   i`* Re: OoL - out at first base?6Martin Harran
11 Dec 24 i   i +- Re: OoL - out at first base?1erik simpson
11 Dec 24 i   i `* Re: OoL - out at first base?4LDagget
12 Dec 24 i   i  `* Re: OoL - out at first base?3Martin Harran
12 Dec 24 i   i   `* Re: OoL - out at first base?2LDagget
12 Dec 24 i   i    `- Re: OoL - out at first base?1DB Cates
11 Dec 24 i   `* Re: OoL - out at first base?2Ernest Major
11 Dec 24 i    `- Re: OoL - out at first base?1LDagget
9 Dec 24 +* Re: OoL – out at first base?9jillery
9 Dec 24 i+* Re: OoL – out at first base?6MarkE
9 Dec 24 ii+* Re: OoL ? out at first base?2aph
9 Dec 24 iii`- Re: OoL ? out at first base?1MarkE
9 Dec 24 ii`* Re: OoL – out at first base?3jillery
11 Dec 24 ii `* Re: OoL – out at first base?2MarkE
11 Dec 24 ii  `- Re: OoL – out at first base?1MarkE
16 Dec19:38 i`* Re: OoL – out at first base?2Mark Isaak
16 Dec21:23 i `- Re: OoL – out at first base?1Kerr-Mudd, John
9 Dec 24 +* Re: OoL – out at first base?7RonO
9 Dec 24 i`* Re: OoL – out at first base?6MarkE
10 Dec 24 i +- Re: OoL – out at first base?1RonO
10 Dec 24 i `* Re: OoL – out at first base?4erik simpson
11 Dec 24 i  `* Re: OoL - out at first base?3Martin Harran
11 Dec 24 i   `* Re: OoL - out at first base?2erik simpson
18 Dec12:36 i    `- Re: OoL - out at first base?1jillery
10 Dec 24 +* Re: Ool - out at first base?82Bob Casanova
11 Dec 24 i`* Re: Ool - out at first base?81MarkE
13 Dec 24 i +* Re: Ool - out at first base?72Ernest Major
13 Dec 24 i i`* Re: Ool - out at first base?71erik simpson
14 Dec 24 i i `* Re: Ool - out at first base?70MarkE
14 Dec 24 i i  +* Re: Ool - out at first base?2erik simpson
14 Dec 24 i i  i`- Re: Ool - out at first base?1MarkE
14 Dec 24 i i  `* Re: Ool - out at first base?67Martin Harran
14 Dec 24 i i   `* Re: Ool - out at first base?66MarkE
14 Dec 24 i i    +* Re: Ool - out at first base?64Martin Harran
14 Dec 24 i i    i`* Re: Ool - out at first base?63MarkE
14 Dec 24 i i    i +* Re: Ool - out at first base?54Martin Harran
15 Dec 24 i i    i i`* Re: Ool - out at first base?53MarkE
15 Dec 24 i i    i i `* Re: Ool - out at first base?52Martin Harran
15 Dec 24 i i    i i  +- Re: Ool - out at first base?1Martin Harran
15 Dec 24 i i    i i  `* Re: Ool - out at first base?50MarkE
15 Dec 24 i i    i i   `* Re: Ool - out at first base?49Martin Harran
16 Dec 24 i i    i i    `* Re: Ool - out at first base?48MarkE
16 Dec20:33 i i    i i     +* Re: Ool - out at first base?6Mark Isaak
18 Dec02:12 i i    i i     i`* Re: Ool - out at first base?5MarkE
18 Dec17:16 i i    i i     i `* Re: Ool - out at first base?4Mark Isaak
18 Dec17:49 i i    i i     i  +- Re: Ool - out at first base?1Martin Harran
19 Dec05:49 i i    i i     i  `* Re: Ool - out at first base?2MarkE
19 Dec17:35 i i    i i     i   `- Re: Ool - out at first base?1Mark Isaak
17 Dec14:07 i i    i i     `* Re: Ool - out at first base?41Martin Harran
17 Dec17:19 i i    i i      +* Re: Ool - out at first base?2erik simpson
17 Dec18:48 i i    i i      i`- Re: Ool - out at first base?1Martin Harran
18 Dec01:32 i i    i i      `* Re: Ool - out at first base?38MarkE
18 Dec15:17 i i    i i       `* Re: Ool - out at first base?37Martin Harran
18 Dec15:52 i i    i i        +- Re: Ool - out at first base?1Martin Harran
18 Dec18:17 i i    i i        +* Re: Ool - out at first base?2Ernest Major
19 Dec10:38 i i    i i        i`- Re: Ool - out at first base?1jillery
19 Dec04:10 i i    i i        `* Re: Ool - out at first base?33MarkE
19 Dec07:17 i i    i i         +* Re: Ool - out at first base?15Vincent Maycock
19 Dec07:33 i i    i i         i+* Re: Ool - out at first base?11MarkE
19 Dec19:50 i i    i i         ii`* Re: Ool - out at first base?10Vincent Maycock
19 Dec23:25 i i    i i         ii `* Re: Ool - out at first base?9MarkE
20 Dec00:32 i i    i i         ii  `* Re: Ool - out at first base?8Vincent Maycock
20 Dec02:42 i i    i i         ii   `* Re: Ool - out at first base?7MarkE
20 Dec03:23 i i    i i         ii    `* Re: Ool - out at first base?6Vincent Maycock
20 Dec05:08 i i    i i         ii     `* Re: Ool - out at first base?5MarkE
20 Dec06:10 i i    i i         ii      +* Re: Ool - out at first base?2Vincent Maycock
20 Dec23:45 i i    i i         ii      i`- Re: Ool - out at first base?1MarkE
21 Dec12:42 i i    i i         ii      +- Re: Ool - out at first base?1jillery
22 Dec21:46 i i    i i         ii      `- Re: Ool - out at first base?1Mark Isaak
19 Dec17:05 i i    i i         i`* Re: Ool - out at first base?3erik simpson
19 Dec19:53 i i    i i         i `* Re: Ool - out at first base?2Vincent Maycock
19 Dec23:08 i i    i i         i  `- Re: Ool - out at first base?1erik simpson
19 Dec11:04 i i    i i         +- Re: Ool - out at first base?1jillery
19 Dec15:56 i i    i i         +* Re: Ool - out at first base?15Martin Harran
19 Dec18:15 i i    i i         i+- Re: Ool - out at first base?1Martin Harran
19 Dec23:20 i i    i i         i`* Re: Ool - out at first base?13MarkE
19 Dec23:31 i i    i i         i +- Re: Ool - out at first base?1erik simpson
20 Dec18:24 i i    i i         i `* Re: Ool - out at first base?11Martin Harran
20 Dec18:44 i i    i i         i  +* Re: Ool - out at first base?2erik simpson
21 Dec00:02 i i    i i         i  i`- Re: Ool - out at first base?1MarkE
20 Dec23:59 i i    i i         i  `* Re: Ool - out at first base?8MarkE
21 Dec08:13 i i    i i         i   `* Re: Ool - out at first base?7Martin Harran
22 Dec19:12 i i    i i         i    `* Re: Ool - out at first base?6Martin Harran
22 Dec22:07 i i    i i         i     +* Re: Ool - out at first base?3William Hyde
23 Dec07:49 i i    i i         i     i`* Re: Ool - out at first base?2Martin Harran
23 Dec18:10 i i    i i         i     i `- Re: Ool - out at first base?1erik simpson
22 Dec23:53 i i    i i         i     +- Re: Ool - out at first base?1jillery
23 Dec17:20 i i    i i         i     `- Re: Ool - out at first base?1erik simpson
19 Dec18:44 i i    i i         `- Re: Ool - out at first base?1Mark Isaak
14 Dec 24 i i    i `* Re: Ool - out at first base?8DB Cates
16 Dec20:16 i i    `- Re: Ool - out at first base?1Mark Isaak
13 Dec 24 i `* Re: Ool - out at first base?8Bob Casanova
10 Dec 24 `* Re: OoL – out at first base?2Kerr-Mudd, John

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal