Re: A chat with AI on OoL

On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 18:39:25 +0000, j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com
(LDagget) wrote:

On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:21:46 +0000, Martin Harran wrote:
>

On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 08:29:08 -0800, erik simpson

>
>

ChatGPT produces no information.  It rephrases what it's been told,
which sometimes makes it clearer.  In particular, the chirality problem
isn't a problem at all.

>
That's an example of what I have just posted about in another thread.
No matter what the scientists say, AI has decided that chirality *is*
a problem so expect to see more and more output based on that
assumption.

>
Echoing Erik, please don't use the term "assumption" respective
to AI. Regurgitation would be more appropriate.

A difference that makes no difference in this context. The problem is
not you or Erik who know lots about OOL or me who knows a little bit
about it; it's people who know nothing about it and will accept an AI
statement of assumption as true, or people like MarkE who desperately
want such an assumption to be true,