Sujet : Re: What points to the ID scam?
De : nospam (at) *nospam* buzz.off (Bob Casanova)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 04. Mar 2025, 17:00:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <9f8esjdcff2k5uj84s6b7qr3dgmdmar4og@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : ForteAgent/7.20.32.1218
On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 19:30:33 -0800, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by erik simpson
<
eastside.erik@gmail.com>:
<snip>
I've never understood the need for the ID proponents to prove that
evolution is wrong. Certainly God could have done it that way, and do
they actually assert that he couldn't? My brother in law is a YEC, and
doesn't accept the larger God that can play with billions of years.
>
That supports the idea that "Man created God in his own
image". It's neither logically consistent (given that belief
usually involves a deity more capable than His believers)
nor particularly religious ("God cannot do anything I
can't").
At best it's a failure of imagination. At worst it's a
denial of divinity.
>
-- Bob C."The most exciting phrase to hear in science, the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov