Sujet : Re: There is no such thing as a Fermi Paradox
De : 69jpil69 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (jillery)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 06. May 2024, 05:43:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : What are you looking for?
Message-ID : <dsng3j1k3cmdntgb97464607ipp2f1n4ip@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
On Wed, 1 May 2024 17:49:12 -0400, JTEM <
jtem01@gmail.com> trolled:
jillery wrote:
>
Getting your knappies twisted over adjectives is stupid.
>
This is a science group. If accuracy doesn't matter to you,
if saying what you mean isn't important, you're in the
wrong group.
Since you mention it, "This" isn't a lexicology group. Whoever named
the Fermi Paradox didn't consult me.
What you
still do *not* say is what you think Fermi said.
>
What answer could possibly alter the fact that the
so called "Fermi Paradox" isn't a paradox at all?
Twisting your knappies over labels is a great way to show your pride
in having no idea what you're talking about.
Whatever adjective you choose to call it, the Fermi Paradox is a good
way to initiate intelligent discussions about why we find no evidence
of Little Green Men visiting Earth.
-- To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge