Re: politics

On 12/20/24 6:07 AM, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:

On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 13:08:43 +0000
Martin Harran <martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:
 

On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 12:32:09 +0000, "Kerr-Mudd, John"
<admin@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>

On Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:02:23 -0500
jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com> wrote:

 []

>
Also Martin Harran is reviving some historical debate about how Galileo was treated.

>
In regard to ID/Creationism/Religion v Science generally, I'd  happily
bet that nothing new has been added in the last 5-10 years, it is
*all* old stuff revisited.
>

I guess so.
 

Anyway, as previously pointed out to you, reading these threads is not
compulsory and, if you don't think they are worthwhile fare for TO,
you could always post something else yourself.
>

 Sure. but I'm mostly here as an observer; I don't have a Great New
Theory to promote. Sorry.
 

>

given before.  I suppose that's better than mindless trolls from J***
enablers, but not by much.
>

 But responding to JTEM *is* enabling it, pshurely?
 

Mindlessness is in the eye of the beholder.
>
JTEM's "debating style" is quite off-putting. Looks like he has troubles and projects them on anyone responding.
>

[]
 

My parents were Christian Scientists (which a very weird religion, BTW), and their credo was "there is no life, truth nor intelligence in matter".  This applies in spades to our favorite troll.