Re: Ool - out at first base?

On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 09:59:06 +1100, MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com> wrote:


On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 17:24:59 +0000, Martin Harran
<martinharran@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 09:20:01 +1100, MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com> wrote:

[…]

Why do many people, including scientists, disagree with you?

>
What scientist disagree with me?

No response.

[…]

Option 2: There is no reason not to think that life came into being
through natural processes, therefore anyone disagreeing with this
position is either unintelligent, ignorant, or dishonest.

>
Where have I ever described you as unintelligent, ignorant, or
dishonest.

No response.

[…]

>
I have told you several times that as a fully convinced Christian, I
see God as having a role in OOL, just not in the way you seem to be
suggesting. Why do you keep ignoring that?

No response.

[…

I can't locate myself in any of them because I cannot see any
rationale in your what you are asking. It took mankind over 2 million
years to figure out what that bright disc is that crosses the sky
every day; what is the significance of your 10,000 years in regard to
abandoning scientific research into OOL (or any area of knowledge for
that matter)?

No response.

 
You seem to think that there is no point in debating with someone who
disagrees with you. YMMV but I have always leaned more from debating
with people who disagree with me than with people who agree with me.

>
My engagement on t.o demonstrates exactly the opposite. But a mutually
compatible basis of argument is required.
>
Your responses confirm that we really don't have necessary common ground
for discussion of this topic. Which is sometimes the case, and no hard
feelings--good to know to save us from talking past one another.

Right enough, it's a bit hard to have a useful debate when I put
effort into giving detailed responses to your questions but you simply
ignore mine.