Re: Top three reasons for optimism about the ID scam

On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 03:55:42 -0500, jillery <69jpil69@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 00:35:54 +0000, j.nobel.daggett@gmail.com (LDagget)
wrote:
>

On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:45:04 +0000, erik simpson wrote:
>

On 1/7/25 11:02 PM, Martin Harran wrote:

On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 08:09:21 -0800, erik simpson
<eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:
>

On 1/7/25 2:08 AM, jillery wrote:

On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 08:27:22 -0800, erik simpson
<eastside.erik@gmail.com> wrote:

[...]
>

To all concerned:  let's drop this endless wrangling over what and when
and how the church dealt with heliocentrism and the nature of its
disapproval.

>
>
It's remarkable how others let these two yammer on and on without so
much as a peep, considering how you and others jump on me for daring
to document J***'s willful stupidity.
>

It's never my intent to jump on you for documenting our troll's crap,
but since he never says anything else it doesn't need documentation.

>
Errr .... you moan about Ron and me wrangling and then instigate what
will inevitably be an even more pointless wrangle.
>

My mistake.  i shouldn't have responded to her.

>
No no no. You shouldn't be the one apologizing.
I should be apologizing for posting on other topics and not recognizing
that the purpose of t.o. is to seek out opportunities to endlessly
respond
to perceptions of offense in long-standing personal grudges.
Because otherwise injustices will remain on the Permanent Record.
I have failed.

>
>
Another irony here is this topic is filled with yammerings from Martin
Harran and Ron O against each other, yet what got your diapers in a
twist is my comment to Erik about his trivially proved lie.  All you
have done with your post above is to demonstrate your long-standing
personal grudges against me.

This just goes to show; with some posters, it's not what is said that
matters, but who says it.

--
To know less than we don't know is the nature of most knowledge