Sujet : Re: The dangers of [p]seudoscience
De : jtem01 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (JTEM)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 18. Apr 2024, 06:08:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Eek
Message-ID : <uvq9sr$23bdm$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
jillery wrote:
JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> trolled:
Because you're not a professional. You're not an authority.
I neither suggest nor imply I am.
If you're going to advocate the silencing of anyone who has
never been indoctrinated, start with yourself.
Unlike
you, I cite those who do as evidence to support my points.
https://groups.google.com/g/talk.origins/c/Aldz7tj5myg/m/zUOUPLKhAAAJActually, you regularly ignore cites and you never even
read your own. You focus laser like on conclusions.
If the collective wasn't mentally retarded, it would understand
how it could cite a paper that concludes [A] in support of the
opposite of [A]. Because "Conclusions" are just opinions, and
they are often wrong. But the paper, if it's legitimate, will
establish facts and those facts can and usually are consistent
with other conclusions.
A fact established in one paper can be used to support or
falsify a claim regarding a totally separate topic!
Speaking rhetorically. You can't even acknowledge cites if they
conflict with your idiotic agenda.
-- https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5