Sujet : Re: There is no such thing as a Fermi Paradox
De : jtem01 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (JTEM)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 24. Apr 2024, 20:22:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Eek
Message-ID : <v0bm4r$2fue1$7@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
jillery wrote:
Ok, so you
Hey, retard; there is no such thing as the Fermi "Paradox."
Fermi didn't present a paradox.
What Fermi laid out does not in any way, shape or form align
with the concept of a paradox.
A paradox isn't merely self refuting -- like pretty much
every post you've ever made. No, it goes beyond that.
Fermi made an assumption. Fermi made a very bad assumption.
You COULD argue, as your disorder forces you to "Argue"
here, that Fermi did not technically make the assumption
but NOTED the assumption of others.
It's still an assumption. It's still not a paradox.
-- https://jtem.tumblr.com/tagged/The%20Book%20of%20JTEM/page/5