Sujet : Re: Paradoxes
De : me22over7 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (MarkE)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 28. Jan 2025, 04:43:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vn9joe$1iavk$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 28/01/2025 1:59 am, Bob Casanova wrote:
One should always exclude (actually, "ignore") explanations
which are by nature impossible to test. And we're back to
the dancing angels. Or the invisible, immaterial elephant in
the closet.
Have fun discussing this sort of thing; I pretty much gave
up inherently fruitless speculations a while ago, at least
as a subject for discussions about science.
After all this you don't seem to comprehend the content and logic of the argument, or choose not to. So we can't even agree to disagree.
Paradoxes
Re: Paradoxes