Sujet : Re: Paradoxes
De : me22over7 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (MarkE)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 29. Jan 2025, 02:57:03
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vnc1tj$23168$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 29/01/2025 2:58 am, Martin Harran wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jan 2025 16:29:24 +1100, MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com> wrote:
[…]
An atheistic worldview may preference naturalistic options, and a
theistic worldview may preference the God option. We may give more
weight and consideration to a particular explanation based, in part, on
our belief.
Just over a week ago, I asked you if you regard acceptance of OOL
through natural process as equating to a rejection of God. You said
no. yet here you go again relating the acceptance of natural forces to
atheism :(
Are you interpreting my statement
"An atheistic worldview may preference naturalistic options..."
as
"acceptance of OOL through natural process [equates] to a
rejection of God"?
The key phrase in my statement is "may preference", which is nowhere near equating OOL through natural process with a rejection of God.
You seem to have an oversensitivity here which is leading you misconstrue my words (again).
Regardless, isn't it a reasonable generalisation to say that with OOL, atheists will strongly/exclusively look to naturalistic explanations, and theists more often than not to supernatural ones?
Paradoxes
Re: Paradoxes