Liste des Groupes | Revenir à t origins |
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 09:19:20 -0700, the following appearedYou've misunderstood. The context was Martin inferring I was a literalist because I quoted Genesis.
in talk.origins, posted by Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off>:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 20:13:29 +1100, the following appearedNo comment? OK.
in talk.origins, posted by MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com>:
>
<snip>>Nope; sorry. "Literalism" literally (sorry 'bout that) means
The measure of literalism is in the *interpretation* of the text of
Genesis, not the quoting of it.
>
that the text is taken exactly as read; no interpretation
allowed. If it's interpreted it's not taken literally.>>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.