Re: o

Ron Dean wrote:

Dexter wrote:

Ron Dean wrote:
 

vallor wrote:

On Sat, 30 Mar 2024 12:37:52 -0400, Ron Dean <rondean-noreply@gmail.com>
wrote in <AdXNN.93920$LONb.3185@fx08.iad>:
 

RonO wrote:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/03/22/west-virginia-

intelligent-design-religion-teaching/367f8bba-
e894-11ee-9eba-1558f848ec25_story.html

 
 
 
The claim is that if a student asks a teacher about some alternative
"theory" the teacher can answer that question, but there is no
recommendation on what an honest and acceptable answer would be
since the "theory" that they want to get into the public schools
isn't a scientific theory, and should probably be labeled as to
what it is in any discussion on the topic.  If the legislators
believe otherwise they should have made that clear in the act, and
they should have been more honest as to what they were doing.

 >
Considering the Intelligent design argument does not identify a
designer? How should this question be answered? A student wanted to
know why Intellignet Design is wrong,

 
The answer to the question is "mu".
 
(The burden of proof is on the ID proponents to present evidence
that it is "right".)
 
Additionally, I see you aren't using a spell checker.  Is that
a new development, or were you fibbing when you said your spell checker
"corrected" the name "Osama" to someone else in your bigoted statement,
hmmm?
 

My bigotry is directed towards terrorist. I hate terrorist violence. I
question that you love terrorist.  But what other reason for challenging
my view?

-------------------------------------
 
Interesting that you should introduce the topic of terrorism in this thread.
If one examines recent christian history, I think it could properly be said
that christianity shares some distinct terroristic tendencies with other
contemporary religions.
 

In my view, there is absolutely no justification for any terrorism regardless
of who's the perpetrator or whatever is the cause. I made this clear: so, why
do you bring this up?

 
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1957842/
>

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/abortviolence/stories/atlanta.htm

>

https://www.justice.gov/crt/recent-cases-violence-against-reproductive-health-care-providers

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Eric-Rudolph
>

https://prochoice.org/violence-against-abortion-providers-continues-to-rise-following-roe-reversal-new-report-finds/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence
 

-------------------------------------

You're the one who noted your bigotry was towards terror and terrorists.
Aren't the actions noted in these links those of terrorists who's motives are
based on their religious beliefs?  It seems I may have found your blind spot.