Sujet : Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!
De : john.harshman (at) *nospam* gmail.com (John Harshman)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 11. Mar 2024, 17:35:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : University of Ediacara
Message-ID : <CYKcnVSaM-JEr3L4nZ2dnZfqlJ8AAAAA@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 3/11/24 9:09 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 22:19:19 -0700, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by John Harshman
<john.harshman@gmail.com>:
On 3/10/24 7:25 AM, dgb (David) wrote:
On 9 Mar 2024 at 11:41:03 GMT, "jillery" <69jpil69@gmail.com> wrote:
>
On 9 Mar 2024 11:01:49 GMT, dgb (David) <david@nomail.afraid.org>
wrote:
>
On 9 Mar 2024 at 10:50:47 GMT, "jillery" <69jpil69@gmail.com> wrote:
>
Patterns exist
everywhere, from stars in the sky to cloud formations to rain drops on
a window,
>
They do indeed!
>
and most of them were created without benefit of intelligence
or purpose or plan.
>
You cannot /possibly/ know that to be true!
>
>
I acknowledge I can't know with absolute certainty it's true, just as
I can't know some intelligence didn't purposely make these patterns
appear as if they followed statistical probability.
>
However, the standard is to identify evidence for a claim. Since
these patterns are consistent with unguided natural processes, that is
sufficient to support my claim. What evidence do you have the
existence of these patterns required intelligence?
>
The evidence may be found here:-
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existence_of_God
>
No, those are arguments, not evidence. Try again.
>
"This argument is evidence!"
There does seem to be a repeating pattern here. The question
is, is it malice or simply ignorance?
Never discount malicious ignorance. Or ignorant malice, for that matter.
Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!
Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!
