Sujet : Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!
De : x (at) *nospam* y.z (Steve L)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 12. Mar 2024, 03:48:37
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <n7gvuida2537pdgejdj6scqj03sd6ntfru@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
On Sun, 3 Mar 2024 14:39:32 -0500, Ron Dean
<
rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:
Science is supposed t be impersonal, unemotional and impervious to
criticism, but because of a personal identity with evolution, to attack
evolution is seen as a personal attack, rendering
a wrath of embittered, spiteful and rhetorical verbal assaults.
This is a common misconception. In fact the scientific method
implicitly recognizes that people are flawed, biased, ego driiven,
etc., and attempts to correct for it. Sometime those very flaws are
what drive discovery. What scientist doesn't dream of being the one to
overturn decades of orthodoxy.and bathe in the glory that follows?
Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!