Re: The Golden Ratio

Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:

On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:39:38 +0100, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
Lodder):
 

Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
>

On 2024-03-07 22:31:27 +0000, Bob Casanova said:
 

On 7 Mar 2024 17:51:40 GMT, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by dgb (David)
<david@nomail.afraid.org>:
 

On 7 Mar 2024 at 17:41:02 GMT, "J. J. Lodder" <J. J. Lodder> wrote:
 

dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
 

On 7 Mar 2024 at 09:38:23 GMT, "J. J. Lodder" <J. J. Lodder> wrote:
 

Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> wrote:
 

dgb (David) <david@nomail.afraid.org> Wrote in message:r

Does this occur by accident?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ra

tio

Or by design?

 
It will never be known.

 
There is nothing to know there,
 
Jan

 
The thing to know, Jan, is that it hasn't all happened by accident!

 
It hasn't happened at all.

 
You are, of course, mistaken.
 

Wrong. Nothing "happened"; the so-called Golden Ratio, like
all mathematical relationships which describe observed
phenomena, is a property of physical

 
mathematical
 

 reality, no more. And,
of course, no less.

>
You are wasting your breath. Bob is an incurable materialist,
incapable of abstraction and idealisation,
>

Ummm, I didn't say that there are no parts of math which are
abstract, only that all math relationships WHICH DESCRIBE
PHYSICAL PHENOMENA are properties of those phenomena.

So the integers are a property of your football scores?
"No more, and no less", like you say,

Jan