Re: The Golden Ratio

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: The Golden Ratio
De : b.schafer (at) *nospam* ed.ac.uk (Burkhard)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 14. Mar 2024, 22:14:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : novaBBS
Message-ID : <6dd62ebaf3b773a727d81965478d3da8@www.novabbs.com>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Rocksolid Light
J. J. Lodder wrote:

Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com> wrote:

nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) writes:
 
dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>
Does this occur by accident?
 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio
 Or by design?
>
Mathematics doesn't occur.
It is.
>
 If it didn't occur then it is, and always was. But was it so before the
beginning of the universe? or maybe the universe didn't begin, because
time and space are not fundamental properties of nature.

The universe, whatever it is, or was, or may be
is irrelevant for mathematics,

Jan
a) yes, I'm back-ish - blame Lawyer Dagget, who put temptation in my path, and directed me to an interface that I can use without going through the hassle of signing up with yet another server :o) Though I'm likely to keep a lower profile than in the past due to work b) While I'd agree personally, there have been some interesting ideas by reasonably serious people who've argued that there is a closer connection than one might think. Most high-profile arguably Eugene Wigner and his famous paper "The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural Sciences" from 1960. Essentially a mathematics version of the "no miracle" argument for scientific realism.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
14 Mar 24 * Re: The Golden Ratio8Burkhard
15 Mar 24 `* Re: The Golden Ratio7J. J. Lodder
15 Mar 24  `* Re: The Golden Ratio6erik simpson
16 Mar 24   +- Re: The Golden Ratio1J. J. Lodder
17 Mar 24   `* Re: The Golden Ratio4Burkhard
17 Mar 24    +- Re: The Golden Ratio1J. J. Lodder
17 Mar 24    `* Re: The Golden Ratio2Burkhard
18 Mar 24     `- Re: The Golden Ratio1J. J. Lodder

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal