Sujet : Re: The Golden Ratio
De : nospam (at) *nospam* de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder)
Groupes : talk.originsDate : 16. Mar 2024, 21:49:08
Autres entêtes
Organisation : De Ster
Message-ID : <1qqhb2l.xd6nbmg89yfjN%nospam@de-ster.demon.nl>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : MacSOUP/2.8.5 (ea919cf118) (Mac OS 10.12.6)
Bob Casanova <
nospam@buzz.off> wrote:
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 19:21:00 +0100, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
Lodder):
Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:
>
On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 13:58:30 +0100, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
Lodder):
Bob Casanova <nospam@buzz.off> wrote:
>
On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 13:39:38 +0100, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J.
Lodder):
Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
On 2024-03-07 22:31:27 +0000, Bob Casanova said:
On 7 Mar 2024 17:51:40 GMT, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by dgb (David)
<david@nomail.afraid.org>:
On 7 Mar 2024 at 17:41:02 GMT, "J. J. Lodder" <J. J. Lodder> wrote
:
dgb <david@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7 Mar 2024 at 09:38:23 GMT, "J. J. Lodder" <J. J. Lodder> wro
te:
Kalkidas <eat@joes.pub> wrote:
dgb (David) <david@nomail.afraid.org> Wrote in message:r
Does this occur by accident?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gol
den
_ra
tio
Or by design?
It will never be known.
There is nothing to know there,
Jan
The thing to know, Jan, is that it hasn't all happened by accide
nt!
It hasn't happened at all.
You are, of course, mistaken.
Wrong. Nothing "happened"; the so-called Golden Ratio, like
all mathematical relationships which describe observed
phenomena, is a property of physical
mathematical
reality, no more. And,
of course, no less.
>
You are wasting your breath. Bob is an incurable materialist,
incapable of abstraction and idealisation,
>
Ummm, I didn't say that there are no parts of math which are
abstract, only that all math relationships WHICH DESCRIBE
PHYSICAL PHENOMENA are properties of those phenomena.
>
So the integers are a property of your football scores?
"No more, and no less", like you say,
>
Overgeneralizations and "football scores" aside...
If I understand you, the mathematical relationships which
describe observed physical relationships do *not* describe
those relationships?
>
Mathematical relationships are mathematical.
They have nothing to do with any reality at all.
>
Whatever you say, Jan; math has no relationship, descriptive
or otherwise, to reality. Got it.
Good to see that you finally got it.
You may move up one level in the cave,
and forget about beating the chalk out of those blackboard erasers,
Jan