Re: THE $10 MILLION PRIZE FOR PROOF EVOLUTION 2.0

  erik simpson wrote:

I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this.

Now close the circle:  It's as worthless as Randi's
prize for "Proving" the paranormal. It's equally as
impossible to force a payout.
That's just how these things work.
Remember Hovind's prize?  It was offered in the exact
same state as Randi's prize was offered, covered under
the exact same laws. Yet someone the drool soaked
crowd that that Randi's prize was authoritative and
only Hovid's prize was a joke.
"Proof" is a joke!
Knuckle dragging fake "Atheists" routinely impose a
burden of "Proof" on theists that they can't hope to
meet in the case of atheism. That's right; it's
impossible to "Prove" that any atheists exists, given
the standard for "Proof" that the online atheists
try to enforce.
After all, the only evidence for atheists are the
self reports of those claiming to be atheists. That's
it.
"Proof" is stupid. Demanding "Proof" is for math, not
science.
THAT is the lesson here, the one nobody is willing to
learn.
Consistency used to be a virtue, like before anyone
here was born, obviously.
--
http://jtem.tumblr.com