Re: THE $10 MILLION PRIZE FOR PROOF EVOLUTION 2.0

On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:06:39 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Richmond <dnomhcir@gmx.com>:

G <g@nowhere.invalid> writes:
>

JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:

 erik simpson wrote:
 

I have sneaking suspicion nobody's going to win this.

 
Now close the circle: It's as worthless as Randi's prize for
"Proving" the paranormal. It's equally as impossible to force a
payout.
 

>
Of course it was impossible to win Randi's prize, you had to
demonstrate psychic or paranormal powers, and no such thing exists.
>

>
How do you know? Can you prove it?
>

That's a bit disingenuous. Can you prove there's no
invisible, impalpable elephant in your front yard?

Rationally, "proving" the nonexistence of something which
has never been demonstrated to exist is trivial; simply
point to the lack of evidence of its existence, and invite
the claimant of existence to show you are wrong by providing
such evidence.

>

--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
 the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov