Re: Animated Series

Liste des GroupesRevenir à t origins 
Sujet : Re: Animated Series
De : admin (at) *nospam* answernot42.com (someone37)
Groupes : talk.origins
Date : 22. Mar 2024, 17:35:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Eweka Internet Services
Message-ID : <8riLN.16198238$ee1.4668669@fx16.ams4>
References : 1
User-Agent : NewsLeecher v7.0 Final (http://www.newsleecher.com)
In reply to "someone37" who wrote the following:

In reply to "Bob Casanova" who wrote the following:
 
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:39:33 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
<ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>:
 
someone37 <admin@answernot42.com> wrote:
 
[snip]
 
The reason is that any computation can be done with an arrangement of
NAND
gates (they are functionally complete) is because a claim that it could
would be
tantamount to suggesting that NAND gates could only be arranged in a
certain way
if the reality was one in which things experienced.
 
Aha, NAND gates. Seems the past 36 incarnations of �someone� were
insufficient to the task so the resurrection ship spawned another. Here we
go again�
 
I knew he (she? it?) sounded familiar. And if anything even
more incoherent than previously.
 
--
 
Bob C.
 
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
 the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
 
- Isaac Asimov
 
Bob C., mentions a minor argument, which explained why whether any of reality
is
experienced or not is not computable. Which could be thought to be an issue
for
a physicalist belief in which we are evolved biological machines whose brains
are running some type of neural network computation (because we can tell that
at
least part of reality is experiencing, which isn't computable). Noticeably Bob
C., didn't offer any flaw in the argument, but I am grateful for him having
looked at the video, and brought up an argument from it. Though the main
issues
raised in that particular video from the series were the Influence Issue, and
the Fine Tuning of the Experience Issue, which he didn't mention.
 
For those that would be interested in just diving into a specific part of the
series to understand what is being referred to, you could just follow this
link
(which skips the first 7 minutes of 4.Belief): https://vimeo.com/
921153137#t=7m
 
There are some comebacks to "4. Belief" covered in the next one in the series,
"5. Issues with belief?".
Series link:https://vimeo.com/showcase/the-lottery-issue
 
 

Whoops, sorry made a mistake there. The poster who had mentioned part of the
video was me. Bob C might not have even viewed it.


Wish you all well, and as a wise man might say:
 "Follow the loving selfless path".

https://vimeo.com/showcase/the-lottery-issue


--
----------------------------------------- --- -- -
Posted with NewsLeecher v7.0 Final
Free Newsreader @ http://www.newsleecher.com/
------------------------------- ----- ---- -- -


Date Sujet#  Auteur
18 Mar 24 * Animated Series17someone37
19 Mar 24 `* Re: Animated Series16someone37
21 Mar 24  +* Re: Animated Series12*Hemidactylus*
21 Mar 24  i+- Re: Animated Series1jillery
21 Mar 24  i+* Re: Animated Series4erik simpson
21 Mar 24  ii+- Re: Animated Series1*Hemidactylus*
1 Apr 24  ii`* Re: Animated Series2Burkhard
2 Apr 24  ii `- Re: Animated Series1*Hemidactylus*
21 Mar 24  i`* Re: Animated Series6Bob Casanova
22 Mar 24  i `* Re: Animated Series5someone37
22 Mar 24  i  +* Re: Animated Series2*Hemidactylus*
22 Mar 24  i  i`- Re: Animated Series1erik simpson
22 Mar 24  i  +- Re: Animated Series1someone37
22 Mar 24  i  `- Re: Animated Series1Bob Casanova
22 Mar 24  +- Re: Animated Series1someone37
24 Mar 24  `* Re: Animated Series2someone37
9 Apr 24   `- Re: Animated Series1Arkalen

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal