Re: Animated Series

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:27:19 GMT, the following appeared in
talk.origins, posted by someone37 <admin@answernot42.com>:

In reply to "Bob Casanova" who wrote the following:
>

On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:39:33 +0000, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by *Hemidactylus*
<ecphoric@allspamis.invalid>:
 

someone37 <admin@answernot42.com> wrote:

 

[snip]

 
The reason is that any computation can be done with an arrangement of NAND
gates (they are functionally complete) is because a claim that it could
would be
tantamount to suggesting that NAND gates could only be arranged in a
certain way
if the reality was one in which things experienced.
 

Aha, NAND gates. Seems the past 36 incarnations of “someone” were
insufficient to the task so the resurrection ship spawned another. Here we
go again…
 

I knew he (she? it?) sounded familiar. And if anything even
more incoherent than previously.

 

--
 
Bob C.
 
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
 the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
 
- Isaac Asimov

>
Bob C., mentions a minor argument
>

No, I did not; I mentioned your incoherence during your
prior appearance, which IIRC I noted at the time. You have
yet to formulate a coherent argument.

>
, which explained why whether any of reality is
experienced or not is not computable. Which could be thought to be an issue for
a physicalist belief in which we are evolved biological machines whose brains
are running some type of neural network computation (because we can tell that at
least part of reality is experiencing, which isn't computable). Noticeably Bob
C., didn't offer any flaw in the argument
>

There was no argument involving you in which I was also
involved. Have you always been delusional?

>
, but I am grateful for him having
looked at the video, and brought up an argument from it. Though the main issues
raised in that particular video from the series were the Influence Issue, and
the Fine Tuning of the Experience Issue, which he didn't mention.
>
For those that would be interested in just diving into a specific part of the
series to understand what is being referred to, you could just follow this link
(which skips the first 7 minutes of 4.Belief): https://vimeo.com/921153137#t=7m
>
There are some comebacks to "4. Belief" covered in the next one in the series,
"5. Issues with belief?".
Series link:https://vimeo.com/showcase/the-lottery-issue
>
>
>
>
>
>
Wish you all well, and as a wise man might say:
"Follow the loving selfless path".
>
https://vimeo.com/showcase/the-lottery-issue

--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
 the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov