Re: West Virginia creationism

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 19:09:27 +0100, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by Athel Cornish-Bowden
<me@yahoo.com>:

On 2024-03-22 17:23:11 +0000, Bob Casanova said:
>

Actually, there's nothing here I wrote.

>

On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 06:51:17 -0500, the following appeared
in talk.origins, posted by RonO <rokimoto@cox.net>:
 

 
[ … ]
 
This again is testing the ID perp's "not required" to be taught scam.
They are not requiring ID to be taught, they are even lying about
wanting to teach it, so we will see how it goes if some stupid, ignorant
and likely dishonest teacher wants to use it to support their religious
beliefs in the science class.  Really, how honest could a teacher be at
this point after decades of the ID scam bait and switch going down on
any hapless rubes that have wanted to teach the lame junk in the public
schools.  No school board or legislator that has wanted to teach ID in
the public schools has ever gotten any ID science to teach from the ID
perps at the Discovery Institute.  There has never been a public school
lesson plan put out for evaluation, and the Discovery Institute used to
claim that Of Pandas and People could be used as a text to teach the
junk, but that ended after the name change from creationism to ID was
exposed in Kitzmiller.

>
If anyone has been puzzled by Jillery's references to cdesign
proponentsists that's where they came from.

--

Bob C.

"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
 the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
 'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"

- Isaac Asimov