Re: CONTRARY EVIDENCE (WASRe: Evide)nce!

*Hemidactylus* wrote:

Ron Dean <rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:

*Hemidactylus* wrote:

Ron Dean <rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:

Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:

On 2024-03-23 23:31:58 +0000, *Hemidactylus* said:
>

Ron Dean <rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:

Mark Isaak wrote:

>

[snip

>
And what about people for whom theism is their greatest motivator, such
as Obama bin Laden? Cynicism seems a rational response.
>

Are you suggesting that Obama bin Laden is typical of Islam? If so,
you're probably right.

>
My apologies to Mark as I just Chez Watted this without realizing Mark
had
originally posted Osama bin Laden and in Ron Dean’s reply Mark’s spelling
morphed to Obama bin Laden matching Ron Dean’s spelling. I wonder what
that
indicates about Ron Dean…

>
Nothing we didn't know already.
>

I spelled it correctly. Look at the above spelling. Can you hazard a
guess what happened?! Probably not!
>

When confronted by one’s own deception of others double down.
>

That's meaningless statement. But my spell checker thinks Obama and
Osama is the same. Maybe so!
>

Did you deliberately alter the wording of Mark Isaak’s post? Stop fucking
around with me.
>

I responded to Mark Isaak's post on 3/23 at 7:17. It was 14 minutes later when the misspelling was
pointed out by you. I saw the post which Jillery posted At 3/23 at 11:44. Early this morning I read
Jill's post until then I was unaware of  misspelling. Then I checked and learned that you had pointed this out yesterday. I frequently correspond with Jill, but rarely with you. Had I not read Jill's post today I seriously doubt I would have have ever known about it.