Liste des Groupes | Revenir à t origins |
*Hemidactylus* wrote:Ron Dean <rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:*Hemidactylus* wrote:Did you deliberately alter the wording of Mark Isaak’s post? Stop fuckingRon Dean <rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:That's meaningless statement. But my spell checker thinks Obama andAthel Cornish-Bowden wrote:When confronted by one’s own deception of others double down.On 2024-03-23 23:31:58 +0000, *Hemidactylus* said:I spelled it correctly. Look at the above spelling. Can you hazard a
>Ron Dean <rondean-noreply@gmail.com> wrote:>Mark Isaak wrote:[snip>>>Are you suggesting that Obama bin Laden is typical of Islam? If so,
And what about people for whom theism is their greatest motivator, such
as Obama bin Laden? Cynicism seems a rational response.
>
you're probably right.
My apologies to Mark as I just Chez Watted this without realizing Mark
had
originally posted Osama bin Laden and in Ron Dean’s reply Mark’s spelling
morphed to Obama bin Laden matching Ron Dean’s spelling. I wonder what
that
indicates about Ron Dean…
Nothing we didn't know already.
>
guess what happened?! Probably not!
>
>
Osama is the same. Maybe so!
>
around with me.
I responded to Mark Isaak's post on 3/23 at 7:17. It was 14 minutes
later when the misspelling was
pointed out by you. I saw the post which Jillery posted At 3/23 at
11:44. Early this morning I read
Jill's post until then I was unaware of misspelling. Then I checked and
learned that you had pointed this out yesterday. I frequently correspond
with Jill, but rarely with you. Had I not read Jill's post today I
seriously doubt I would have have ever known about it.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.